Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
About
In the existing Aggressive hydration comparison study related to the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), research bias may occur due to the lack of blinding between fluids, so in this study, the investigators will conduct a multicenter randomized comparative study in which the comparative fluids are double-blinded to observe differences between fluids in the preventive effect of pancreatitis that occurs after ERCP (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography).
A total of 844 patients scheduled for ERCP will be enrolled in this clinical trial and randomly assigned to the lactated Ringer's solution or to the Plasma solution in a 1:1 ratio. Eligible patients will receive study drug or control drug for up to 24 hours before and after ERCP implementation.
In previous comparative studies related to PEP prevention, research bias may have been introduced because of insufficient blinding of the treatment strategies, as well as instances where the evaluating investigator did not perform blinding. We are therefore conducting a multicenter, randomized comparative study double-blinded as to the two types of fluid (lactated Ringer's solution or plasma solution), and in which the endoscopists, outcome assessors and patients are blinded to the randomization allocation.
Full description
Post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), which occurs in 2% to 15% of all patients undergoing ERCP and is treated conservatively with fasting and sufficient fluid supply according to the standards of care for general acute pancreatitis, and most patients improve within a few days without major complications. However, high-risk patients are more susceptible to PEP with incidence rates between 15% and 42%, and severe pancreatitis can develop in 11.4% of PEP cases with a 3% mortality rate. Therefore, there are significant unmet needs for PEP patients.
In this trial, all patients will receive aggressive hydration involving fluids that are commercially available and widely administered. The trial aims to minimize potential risks and has established routine safety monitoring to protect the participants.
In real practice, it is crucial to consider not just the type of fluid utilized, but also the most effective fluid volume for preventing PEP, along with the optimal timing for administering the fluid. Given that a significant number of ERCPs are performed in outpatient settings in the USA and other countries, the current protocol allowing outpatients to occupy recovery areas for extended periods, such as 8 hours post-ERCP, seems challenging to implement in real clinical practice. These considerations highlight the necessity for a re-evaluation of existing guidelines. Therefore, the present reassessment aims, not only to optimize efficiency and patient flow in medical settings but also to evaluate the effectiveness of the protocol in preventing PEP considering practical duration of intravenous fluid infusion, such as 4 hours postprocedure.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Among patients with naive major duodenal papilla in patients, we will include those who are at average-to-high risk of PEP (if one or more of the following criteria) after ERCP and agree to enroll in this clinical trial.
Exclusion criteria
Subjects are excluded if they meet any of the following items.
Not consented to study participation
18 years of age or younger
Severe comorbidities (e.g., end-stage kidney disease, end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypoglycemic dysregulation, decompensated cirrhosis)
Sepsis (defined as meeting two or more of the following items):
Acute pancreatitis
Chronic pancreatitis
Heart failure (NYHA class 2 or higher)
Clinical signs of fluid overload
Hypernatremia (>150 mEq/L) or hyponatremia (<130 mEq/L)
History of endoscopic sphincterotomy
History of endoscopic papillary (balloon) dilation
Hypercalcemia or alkalemia
Scheduled for regular endoscopic biliary stent change
Patients with pancreatic head tumors and a presumed low risk for pancreatitis
Lack of access to the major duodenal papilla due to surgically altered anatomy
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
844 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Eun Ha Kim; SungJin Eum
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal