Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Agonist triggering in controlled ovarian stimulation protocols is being used during last years (among high responder patients to avoid OHSS).
Indeed, agonist triggering is more physiologic than HCG triggering. Investigators propose to compare the effectiveness of both types of trigger among three different subsets of patients:
Full description
During the last years, ovulation triggering in controlled ovarian stimulation protocols has been used specially to avoid hyperstimulation syndromes (OHSS). Indeed, the substitution of the classical HCG triggering by the agonist one, reduces almost to zero the risk of OHSS.
On the other hand poor responder patients to ovarian stimulation represent a challenge in assisted reproduction. Defining poor responders is not easy, but we can define them as those patients with less than 4 eggs obtained after oocyte retrieval.
Different strategies have been proposed to overcome this problem. In other words, to obtain more oocytes. These include an increase in FSH doses, an increase in FSH action by adding sensitizers agents.
Among the possible strategies, investigators propose the agonist triggering. HCG (classical) triggering represents the use of a LH-like product (with a prolonged action). The administration of a GnRH agonist provoke the production and liberation of both FSH and LH. Thus, the pro-ovulatory action is more physiologic , and possibly, more effective.
So, the use of a triggering protocol that nowadays is being used among high responders (thus reducing the OHSS risk) is proposed for both poor responder and normo-responder patients trying to achieve more oocytes, and specifically more mature oocytes.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
300 participants in 6 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Amaia Garcia, PhD; Gorka Barrenetxea, PhD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal