Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
To compare air Q versus ILMA intubation in obese adult paralyzed patient
Full description
Evaluate the process of endo-tracheal intubation through Air Q compared to through ILMA regarding number and duration of attempts, laryngeal view grade, time to removal of device over tube without dislodgement and any complication
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:All morbidly obese patient defined as BMI >40 kg/m2 scheduled for an elective surgery requiring general anesthesia with tracheal intubation were enrolled on the day of their surgery.
ASA physical status (I-II)
Exclusion Criteria physical status of IV or V or had a history of impossible tracheal intubation or awake fibreoptic intubation or if preoperative evaluation showed limited mouth aperture <3.5 cm or showed evidence that an awake fiberoptic intubation or rapid sequence induction would be required patients at increased risk for aspiration of gastric contents, coagulopathy or those with unstable cervical spines or requiring nasal route for tracheal intubation
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
80 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal