Status
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
The aim of this study is to evaluate the positioning time and the malpositioning rate of DLTs and BBs, the degree of difficulty perceived in device positioning, the use of bronchoscopy (BRO), and the quality of lung collapse achieved during ONE LUNG VENTILATION.
Full description
Safety and efficacy of the double-lumen tubes (DLT) and bronchial blockers (BB) for lung isolation in patients undergoing thoracic surgery have been extensively studied and most of the results show similar rates of successful placement and lung collapse. DLT and BB are more frequently inserted by anesthetists who are expert in thoracic anesthesia, with dedicated but different training.
The first objective of this study was to evaluate the positioning time and the malpositioning rate of DLTs and BBs, the degree of difficulty perceived in device positioning, the use of bronchoscopy (BRO), and the quality of lung collapse achieved during OLV.
A prospective observational study was designed. To check the optimal DLT (Broncho-Cath Covidien, Ireland, Dublin, Teleflex Medical, Athlone, Irelanad) and/or BB (Uniblocker, Phycon, Fuji, Japan Arndt Cohen Cook, Australia), placement a fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB) was used. The lung collapse was assessed by surgeons.
Time from laringoscopy to the correct placement of the device, confirmed with FOB, was checked.
Data were analyzed with Student't Test and Chi-square test; p value < 0.05 was considered to be significant.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
2,225 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal