ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Ambu®AuraGain™ Versus I-gel® in Obese Patients

S

Schulthess Klinik

Status

Completed

Conditions

Obese

Treatments

Device: Ambu AuraGain
Device: Intersurgical i-gel

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT03110393
Schulthess_Anä_10

Details and patient eligibility

About

The aim of this study is the randomized comparison of two laryngeal mask (Intersurgical i-gel® and Ambu®AuraGain™) in obese patients

Full description

Since the incidence of a difficult intubation lies between 4.5% -7.5%, the search for alternative airway devices has been forced in the past.

As an option, the laryngeal mask is suitable, which has been used as a universal airway with a high degree of safety in routine anesthesia.

There are numbers of different laryngeal masks available which have the characteristic to insert an endotracheal tube through the ventilation lumen.

The indications for these laryngeal masks can be extended due to continuous improvements in the laryngeal masks, these laryngeal masks can also be used in obese patients. Obese patients generally have a 4-fold increased risk of a difficult airway, and a BMI over 35 is a predictor of a difficult tracheal intubation.

There are no studies comparing the Intersurgical i-gel® Laryngeal Mask and the Ambu®AuraGain ™ Laryngeal Mask in obese patients.

Enrollment

44 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 70 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • ASA 1-3
  • Shoulder-/Elbow-/Hip-/Knee- or Foot - Surgery
  • Signed informed consent
  • BMI > 35kg/m2

Exclusion criteria

  • Non-sober patients (last meal <6 h)
  • Symptomatic reflux disease
  • Hiatus hernia
  • Significant cardiovascular risk factors
  • Severe COPD
  • Gastric band or gastric bypass
  • Disease which allows an accurate examination of the physicians (e.g. neuromuscular, mental, metabolic disease)
  • Drug or drug abuse in the recent past
  • Legal immaturity (incompetence)
  • Acute disease, which calls into question the narcotic potential
  • Patients with whom the use of a laryngeal mask is contraindicated or otherwise not possible

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

44 participants in 2 patient groups

Ambu® AuraGain™
Experimental group
Description:
Intervention with Ambu® AuraGain™Laryngeal Mask
Treatment:
Device: Ambu AuraGain
Intersurgical i-gel®
Active Comparator group
Description:
Intervention with Intersurgical i-gel® Laryngeal Mask
Treatment:
Device: Intersurgical i-gel

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems