Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
About
Full description
Previous meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that the long acting dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker amlodipine (Norvasc®), compared with other antihypertensive drugs, provides more protection against stroke. The benefit of amlodipine against stroke is approximately 10% greater than diuretics/β-blockers, and 20% greater than angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers. Of all the dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, only amlodipine provides protection against myocardial infarction similar as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, diuretics and β-blockers, and more than angiotensin receptor blockers. The benefit of amlodipine in the prevention of stroke might be attributable to its 24-h blood pressure control.
24-h ambulatory blood pressure is more predictive of cardiovascular events than clinic pressure measured in doctor's office. The smoother the 24-h ambulatory blood pressure control, the lower the risk of target organ damage. Both systolic and diastolic blood pressure show a circadian rhythm with a nocturnal blood pressure fall and a morning blood pressure surge. The incidence of cardiovascular complications of hypertension, such as myocardial infarction and stroke, is higher in the early morning hours than the rest of the day. Several previous studies have demonstrated that an exaggerated morning blood pressure surge is associated with the incidence of stoke and with cardiovascular structural remodeling. Moreover, non-dipping of blood pressure at night (non-dipper, nighttime blood pressure fall less than 10%) is prevalent and is associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular event. In a recent study of controlled hypertensive patients, the prevalence of non-dipping of blood pressure at night was 62%. In our JingNing population study, we found that Chinese had a higher nighttime diastolic blood pressure than White populations, and the prevalence of isolated nocturnal hypertension was 10.9%. Patients with isolated nocturnal hypertension compared with normotensive subjects had an increased arterial stiffness. Thus, a preferable antihypertensive drug should not only reduce the 24-h mean level of blood pressure, but should also effectively control morning blood pressure surge and reduce nighttime blood pressure.
At present, there are two mechanisms of long-acting antihypertensive agents. One is that the compound itself has a long half life time and hence shows a long term effect. Another is that the efficacy of a short-acting drug is elongated by using a slow release or a controlled release (such as GITS) technique. However, the latter mechanism may vary between individuals because of the difference in the gastrointestinal function. Therefore, a long-acting compound should be more reliable in the maintenance of long term efficacy than slow release or controlled release agents. In the class of dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, amlodipine is a long-acting compound because of a long half life time (up to 50 hours), and nifedipine GITS uses a controlled release technique. Several recent studies compared 24-h blood pressure lowering effect of these 2 drugs, but produced inconsistent results. At least one study suggested that amlodipine may prevent morning blood pressure rise more effectively than nifedipine GITS. However, other studies demonstrated similar effect on morning blood pressure control of these 2 drugs. The inconsistency might be attributable to a chance finding, because of the small sample size (less than 100). Therefore, a randomized controlled trial with a larger sample size is required to compare these 2 dihydropyridines in the blood pressure control over 24 hours in general and during early morning hours and at night in particular.
The secondary objective of the study is to compare the effects of amlodipine and nifedipine GITS in reducing nighttime blood pressure (10 pm to 4 am) in patients with a decreased nocturnal blood pressure fall.
Study design: The present study is designed as a randomized, actively controlled, multi-centre parallel group trial (phase Ⅳ) with two equally sized treatment groups: amlodipine and nifedipine GITS.
Study population: In 20 research-oriented university hospitals in China and in a pre-defined timeframe, 500 patients will be considered for inclusion into the present study according to the inclusion/exclusion criteria.
Randomization and treatment: After stratification for centre, 500 eligible patients will be randomized into 2 groups. 250 will receive amlodipine 5 mg per day, and 250 will receive nifedipine GITS 30 mg per day.
At 4 weeks of follow-up, the drug dosage per day may increase to 10 mg of amlodipine and 60 mg of nifedipine GITS, if blood pressure measured in doctor's office cannot be controlled to a level below 140/90 mm Hg. If there were no compelling indication, no other antihypertensive drug is allowed during the 2-month trial. All antihypertensive medication should be taken before breakfast from 6-8 clock in the morning.
Only validated blood pressure monitors (SpaceLabs 90207 and 90217) will be used. Before each ambulatory blood pressure measurement, blood pressure monitors will be set up in a standardized way. A cuff of proper size should be secured to the left arm of the patient. Before the commencement of ambulatory blood pressure measurement, blood pressure will be measured twice using mercury sphygmomanometer. Immediately after these 2 measurements, blood pressure will be measured twice manually with the monitor. Then, blood pressure will be measured automatically according to predefined time intervals of the blood pressure monitor (every 20 minutes from 8 am to 10 pm and every 30 minutes from 10 pm to 8 am). At the end of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, data will be transferred to a computer program. The same size cuff and the same arm should be used for all 3 ambulatory measurements for a patient. On the monitoring day, the patient should record the time to go to bed and to get up, the use of medications, and physical activity.
Potential difficulties: During the study, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring may fail because of less than 20 readings during the whole day, less than 10 readings in the daytime or less than 5 readings at night. These failed measurements will have to be repeated.
Sample size estimation and statistical analysis: It is projected that the standard deviation of morning blood pressure in the enrolled hypertensive patients is 12 mm Hg, and amlodipine, compared with nifedipine GITS, reduces morning blood pressure at 4 months of follow-up by 4 mm Hg. If α=0.05 and power=90%, the study will require a sample size of 190 hypertensive patients per group to detect the projected difference in the morning blood pressure (4 am-8 am). After accounting for 5% of drop out rate and 20% patients on add-on therapy, the sample size for each group is 250. Thus the number of required subject for the whole trial is 500.
The trial will mainly compare the amlodipine with nifedipine GITS group in the changes of morning blood pressure (4 am-8 am, about 8 blood pressure readings) and nighttime blood pressure (10 pm-4 am) at 4 and 8 weeks from baseline. The student t test will be used and 95% confidence interval of the differences between the 2 groups will be computed. In addition, an adjusted analysis (ANOVA) will also be performed while accounting for major baseline characteristics.
Timeline: The trial will start from October 2009, 500 eligible patients would be randomized and followed up for 2 months. Database construction and statistical analysis will take 3 months. The trial will be published at the international congresses and in the English and Chinese literature in 2013.
Organization: The principal investigator will be Professor Jiguang Wang from the Centre for Epidemiological Studies and Clinical Trials, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, China. Professor Yan Li from the same centre will be the coordinator of the trial. 20 research oriented hospitals will participate in the recruitment of the study subjects. At least 20 subjects should be recruited in each of the participating hospitals.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
510 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal