ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

AMNIOHEAL RWE Trial: Amnion Grafts for Healing Hard-to-Heal Ulcers in RW Populations

C

Capsicure, LLC

Status

Begins enrollment this month

Conditions

Venous Leg Ulcer
Wound; Foot
Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU)

Treatments

Other: IP1: BioLab Membrane Wrap Lite IP2: BioLab Tri-Membrane Wrap
Other: IP2: BioLab Tri-Membrane Wrap

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

NETWORK
Industry

Identifiers

NCT07046767
AMNIOHEAL

Details and patient eligibility

About

AMNIOHEAL RWE Trial: A Multicenter hybrid platform trial comparing the effects of a prospective cohort treated with a tri-layer amnion graft or a single layer amnion graft to a coarsened exact matched retrospective control cohort of patients with hard-to-heal DFUs and VLUs

Full description

A multicenter hybrid platform trial comparing the effects of a prospective cohort treated with a tri layer amnion graft or a single layer amnion graft to a coarsened exact matched retrospective control cohort of patients with hard-to-heal DFUs and VLUs

Hybrid prospective platform 2 arm, comparative, randomized multicenter study with a CSM matched retrospective control group Interventional comparative study

  • IP 1: BioLab Membrane Wrap Lite
  • IP2: BioLab Tri-Membrane Wrap

Standard of care: Debridement, maintenance of proper moisture balance, reduction in bacterial burden, offloading and multilayer compression.

Patients with nonhealing venous leg ulcerations or diabetic foot ulcers of at least 4-weeks duration that have failed to show 50% PAR with SOC therapies Patients receiving SOC therapies for hard-to-heal VLUs and/or DFUs

To gather prospective real-world evidence (RWE) in both diabetic foot ulcers and venous leg ulcers increasing the understanding of treatment performance in everyday clinical settings, capturing insights from a more diverse patient population than traditional clinical trials. This information is vital for evaluating the effectiveness of innovative wound care strategies in practical, real-life scenarios

To demonstrate the clinical effectiveness of IP1 and IP2 as an adjunct to standard of care in supporting wound healing compared to standard of care alone in venous leg ulcers and diabetic foot ulcers across the continuum of care.

Enrollment

165 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  1. Male or female 18 years of age and older
    1. Subjects having a non-healing venous leg ulcer or diabetic foot ulcer of >4 weeks duration and visible signs of healing objectively, less than 50% reduction in wound size in the last 4 weeks
  2. Subjects' wound size is minimum of 2 cm2 and maximum of 25cm2
  3. If the subject has more than one eligible wound the largest wound will be selected (the index wound)
  4. Subject is able and willing to follow the protocol requirements
  5. Subject has signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  1. Inability to adhere to the study protocol or study visit schedule
  2. Pregnancy
  3. Child-bearing potential without appropriate contraception
  4. Lactation
  5. Treatment of the wound with engineered tissue or other scaffold materials within 30 days preceding the first treatment visit.
  6. Visible signs of improvement in the four weeks before randomisation (defined objectively as a 50% reduction in surface area in the four weeks before enrolment)
  7. The subject has other concurrent conditions that in the opinion of the investigator may compromise subject safety
  8. Known contraindications to the use of amniotic tissue grafts
  9. The index ulcer shows clinical signs and symptoms of wound infection needing treatment with local or systemic antimicrobials or antibiotics

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

165 participants in 3 patient groups

Standard of Care
No Intervention group
Description:
This study will employ a platform umbrella design in which two studies will be run: one for diabetic foot ulcers and one for venous leg ulcers. Each study will have two intervention groups and one common SOC group. Subjects will be randomized to one of two interventions: IP1: BioLab Membrane Wrap Lite IP2: BioLab Tri-Membrane Wrap Subjects in the control group will be drawn from the same sites as those conducting the prospective portion of the study. The matching of intervention to control groups will use coarsened exact matching (CSM) in which key variables are used to match: e.g., age, sex, baseline wound area, baseline wound age. The desired control subject pool should be three times larger than the prospective group (at least 165 in wound type.
IP1: BioLab Membrane Wrap Lite
Experimental group
Description:
This study will employ a platform umbrella design in which two studies will be run: one for diabetic foot ulcers and one for venous leg ulcers. Each study will have two intervention groups and one common SOC group. Subjects will be randomized to one of two interventions: IP1: BioLab Membrane Wrap Lite IP2: BioLab Tri-Membrane Wrap Subjects in the control group will be drawn from the same sites as those conducting the prospective portion of the study. The matching of intervention to control groups will use coarsened exact matching (CSM) in which key variables are used to match: e.g., age, sex, baseline wound area, baseline wound age. The desired control subject pool should be three times larger than the prospective group (at least 165 in wound type.
Treatment:
Other: IP1: BioLab Membrane Wrap Lite IP2: BioLab Tri-Membrane Wrap
IP2: BioLab Tri-Membrane Wrap
Experimental group
Description:
This study will employ a platform umbrella design in which two studies will be run: one for diabetic foot ulcers and one for venous leg ulcers. Each study will have two intervention groups and one common SOC group. Subjects will be randomized to one of two interventions: IP1: BioLab Membrane Wrap Lite IP2: BioLab Tri-Membrane Wrap Subjects in the control group will be drawn from the same sites as those conducting the prospective portion of the study. The matching of intervention to control groups will use coarsened exact matching (CSM) in which key variables are used to match: e.g., age, sex, baseline wound area, baseline wound age. The desired control subject pool should be three times larger than the prospective group (at least 165 in wound type.
Treatment:
Other: IP2: BioLab Tri-Membrane Wrap

Trial contacts and locations

0

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems