ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Analgesic Effect of Erector Spinae Plane Block After Caesarean Section (AnESPaCS)

A

Ataturk University

Status

Completed

Conditions

Ceserean Section and Postoperative Pain

Treatments

Procedure: Erector Spinae Plane Block

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT04599842
B.30.2.ATA.0.01.00/1

Details and patient eligibility

About

Background: Our hypothesis was that bilateral ESP block applied from the transverse process of T9 in women who underwent elective cesarean section with pfannenstiel incision under spinal anesthesia could provide effective postoperative analgesia.The primary outcome in this study was total opioid consumption for 24 hours.

Material and Method: This randomized prospective study was carried out on 50 pregnant women who was scheduled for elective cesarean delivery via a Pfannenstiel incision with spinal anesthesia.Patients were randomly allocated in to two equal groups.Group SA was categorized as the group which spinal anaesthesia alone (SA) was performed, Group SA+ESP was categorized as group which SA+ESP block was performed. All groups received 7 mg isobaric bupivacaine +15 µg fentanyl intrathecally through spinal anesthesia. The SA+ESP group, ESP block was performed at the ninth thoracic transverse process with 20 ml 0.25% bupivacaine + 2 mg dexamethasone immediately after the operation. Total fentanyl consumption in 24 hrs, visual analogue scale (VAS) score for pain, time to the first analgesic request were evaluated postoperatively.

Enrollment

50 patients

Sex

Female

Ages

18 to 45 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Inclusion Criteria:pregnant women,38-42 gestational weeks, ASA I-II

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ≤18 or ≥45 age, has emergency obstetric surgery, pregnancy induced hypertension, significantly systematic disease, foetal or placental abnormality, hypersensitivity or allergy history to medicine to be used in the study, BMI≥35, autonomic neuropathy, diabetic, contraindicate to apply neuroachylic anaesthesia, who was transferred to general anaesthesia, could not decide or did not want to participate in the study, had severe respiratory and cardiac disease, was transferred to general anaesthesia, has infection, spine or chest wall deformity in operation area, has opioid dependence, chronic analgesic usage, inability to use a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device, couldn't be able to cooperative and express their pain with visual analogue scale score (VAS).

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

50 participants in 2 patient groups

GROUP SA
No Intervention group
Description:
Group SA was categorized as the group which spinal anaesthesia alone (SA) was performed
GROUP SA+ESP
Active Comparator group
Description:
Group SA+ESP was categorized as group which SA+ESP block was performed.
Treatment:
Procedure: Erector Spinae Plane Block

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems