Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Cholecystectomy is the most frequently performed abdominal surgery in developed nations, with laparoscopic cholecystectomy being recognized as the gold standard technique for treating gallstones.
The efficacy of TAP block for pain relief has been well-documented following laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures. Recently, m-TAPA block has emerged as an alternative analgesic technique for abdominal surgeries.
This study aims to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of these two analgesic methods in managing postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Full description
Cholecystectomy is the most commonly performed abdominal surgery in developed countries, with laparoscopic cholecystectomy regarded as the gold standard technique for gallstone treatment.
Postoperative pain following laparoscopic cholecystectomy is influenced by several factors, making it a complex and predominantly visceral pain. These factors include phrenic nerve irritation due to CO2 insufflation, abdominal distension, port site incisions, the effects of gallbladder removal, and individual patient characteristics.
Regional analgesia has gained widespread acceptance from both patients and physicians, becoming a key component of multimodal analgesia techniques. The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block has proven effective in reducing postoperative pain in surgeries such as hysterectomy, cholecystectomy, cesarean section, and colorectal procedures.
The Ultrasound (US)-guided Modified Thoracoabdominal Nerve Block Through Perichondrial Approach (M-TAPA) involves administering a local anesthetic to the underside of the perichondral surface. This technique provides effective analgesia for the anterior and lateral thoracoabdominal regions.
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of US-guided M-TAPA block with TAP block for postoperative analgesia following cholecystectomy.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
12 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal