Anatomic and Biomechanical Investigation on ACL: A Cadaveric Study

Peking University

Status: Unknown

Conditions: Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture

Treatments: Procedure: flat tunnel; Procedure: round tunnel

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT04957797

M2019056

Details and patient eligibility

About

The present study was aimed to investigate the kinematics differences between round-tunnel (ROT) and flat-tunnel (FLT) techniques and compare the influence to the anterior root of lateral meniscus (ARLM ) in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction when using hamstring graft.

Full description

Nine matched pairs of fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were evaluated for the kinematics of intact, ACL-sectioned, and either ROT or FLT reconstructed knees. The graft bundles for FLT technique were separately tensioned. A 6 degrees of freedom robotic system was used to assess knee laxity: (1) 134-N anterior tibial load at 0°, 15°, 30°, 60°, and 90°of knee flexion. (2) 10-Nm of valgus torque followed by 5-Nm of internal rotation torque simulates a pivot-shift test at 15°, 30°. (3) 5-Nm internal and external rotation torques at 0°, 15°, 30°, 60°, and 90°. (4) 10-Nm varus and valgus torques at 15°, 30°. Coverage of ACL tibial footprint and areas of ARLM attachment before and after reaming were measured using three-dimensional isotropic MRI scanning.

Enrollment: 9 estimated patients

Sex: All

Ages: 18 to 70 years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• intact knee with no previous injures

Exclusion criteria

• those with ligamentous injury or a limited range of motion

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: Double Blind

---

9 participants in 2 patient groups

ROT-Group

Other group

Description:

reamed with round tunnel

Treatment:

Procedure: round tunnel

FLT-Group

Experimental group

Description:

reamed with flat tunnel

Treatment:

Procedure: flat tunnel