ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Anatomic Relationship Of the Popliteal Vessels In Open Wedge Osteotomy

A

Assiut University

Status

Not yet enrolling

Conditions

Knee Osteoarthritis

Treatments

Procedure: High Tibial Osteotomy (Uniplanar and Biplanar )

Study type

Observational

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT05807451
Tibial Osteotomy

Details and patient eligibility

About

The Aim Is To Study The Anatomic Relationship Of The Popliteal Vesseles In Two Types Of (OWHTO) Techniques (Monoplanar VS Biplanar) Which Provide More Safe Technique To The PV

Full description

Open wedge High tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) is a common surgical Procedure that is utilized to correct knee varus deformity and prevent development or advancement of medial compatment knee osteoarthritis.

By turning the mechanical weight-bearing axis to the lateral side it correct lower limb alignment,decrease medial compartment load,pain,arthritic changes, postpone the need for arthroplasty and allow cartilage regeneration.

Like any other surgical procedure (OWHTO) has its own complications.injury to the popliteal vessels (PV) is catastrophic and limb threatening compliation that had been reported with prevalence rate ranging from 0.4% to 1.7% PV runs close to the posterior tibial cortex it might be injured while taking osteotomy cut. To avoid this problem many studies with different tools done to define PV position and its relations to provide safe technique for osteotomy.

(OWHTO) has different methods: Monoplanar and Biplanar osteotomy are most popular,both techniques differ in cut level and shape.

In this study the investigators compare between the two methods (Monoplanar VS Biplanar) concerning their proximity and safety to the PV .

Our hypothesis is that there is increase in the distance between the PV and the posterior tibial cortex the more distal the osteotomy level.

Previous studies cadaveric or preoperative studies provide useful informations with some different results , to the best of our knowledge postoperative studies rarely reported in this subject , the investigators hope this study could provide valuable informations,recommend safer technique and improve surgical outcomes from this procedure.

Enrollment

36 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

30 to 60 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • age 30-60
  • BMI less than 30
  • isolated medial compartment OA
  • mild to moderate degree OA Grade 2 to 3 according to kellgren&Lawrence classification
  • near normal lateral and patellofemoral compartment
  • intact lateral meniscus
  • varus malalignment less than 15 degree
  • functional range of motion

Exclusion criteria

  • inflammatory arthritis
  • post traumatic arthritis
  • patients with previous peripheral arterial injury
  • disease or prior insertion of metallic stent in the PV
  • patient allergic to contrast agent
  • patient with renal impairement
  • Patients who refuse to participate in the study
  • Patients who are not available for follow up

Trial design

36 participants in 2 patient groups

Monoplanar Osteotomy group
Description:
High Tibial Osteotomy using single plane osteotomy
Treatment:
Procedure: High Tibial Osteotomy (Uniplanar and Biplanar )
Biplanar Osteotomy group
Description:
High Tibial Osteotomy using two plane osteotomy
Treatment:
Procedure: High Tibial Osteotomy (Uniplanar and Biplanar )

Trial contacts and locations

0

Loading...

Central trial contact

Ali Ayman Farouk, physician; Islam Karm Allah Ramadan, lecturer

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems