ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Anesthesia Techniques in Symptomatic Mandibular Molars With Irreversible Pulpitis

Ç

Çukurova University

Status

Completed

Conditions

Anesthesia, Dental

Treatments

Device: Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Group
Device: Intraligamentary Injection Group

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT05839093
TDH-2020-12818

Details and patient eligibility

About

The aim of this clinical study is to evaluate the success of buccal infiltration (BI) anesthesia + intraligamentary (ILI) anesthesia between inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) anesthesia + buccal infiltration anesthesia in mandibular molar teeth with acute symptomatic irreversible pulpitis.The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does the anesthesia techniques adequate to perform root canal treatment painlessly?
  • Which technique achieved pulpal anesthesia? Participants were allocated in two groups according to the randomization blocks, with a total of 25 patients in each group. In IANB + BI anesthesia techniques, a total of approximately 2.8 ml of anesthetic solution, 1.8 ml + 1 ml, was applied, while for BI + ILI, a total of approximately 1.72 ml, 1 ml + 0.72 ml, was administered. Then, root canal treatment was performed.

Researchers were compared the success of anesthesia techniques in different stages of root canal treatment.

Full description

A total of 50 patients, aged between 18-65, who were diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis of the mandibular molar tooth, were included in this study. The patients were allocated in two groups according to the randomization blocks, with a total of 25 patients in each group. In IANB + BI anesthesia techniques, a total of approximately 2.8 ml of anesthetic solution, 1.8 ml + 1 ml, was applied, while for BI + ILI, a total of approximately 1.72 ml, 1 ml + 0.72 ml, was administered. After the anesthesia, a rubber dam was placed on the associated tooth of the patient for root canal treatment, the endodontic access cavity was opened, and canal preparation procedures were started. The pain levels felt by the patients during the endodontic treatment stages (starting the treatment, opening the endodontic access cavity and pulp extirpation) were determined by Heft-Parker VAS (HP-VAS) scale. Anesthesia was considered successful in patients who felt no pain (HP-VAS ratio = 0) or mild pain (HP-VAS ratio ≤ 54) during the procedures.

Enrollment

210 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 65 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  1. Systemically healthy patients
  2. The absence of periapical pathology
  3. Not sensitive to articaine or epinephrine
  4. No facial paresthesia
  5. Not taking any analgesic drug 6 hours before treatment
  6. Not taking any medication that interferes with anesthesia, such as tricyclic antidepressants and beta-blockers
  7. The absence of pathosis in areas planned for injection
  8. Not pregnant
  9. The absence of pathologic periodontal pockets during probing
  10. Patients with a mandibular first molar tooth exhibiting symptomatic irreversible pulpitis

Exclusion criteria

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Double Blind

210 participants in 2 patient groups

Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Group
Active Comparator group
Description:
A standard Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block (IANB) injection with a conventional dental injector and a 27-G needle to achieve pulpal anesthesia in mandibular molar teeth.
Treatment:
Device: Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Group
Intraligamentary Injection Group
Experimental group
Description:
An intraligamentary injection that performed with a special pressure injection syringe (Sopira Citoject, Kulzer, Hanau, Germany) and a 30-G needle.
Treatment:
Device: Intraligamentary Injection Group

Trial documents
1

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems