Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
SUMMARY Rationale: Prophylactic antibiotics in laparoscopic surgeries, including Metabolic Bariatric Surgery (MBS), are routinely provided to reduce postoperative infections, especially at wound incision sites. However, since incisional wound infections in laparoscopic MBS are rare and morbidity is very low, the benefit of antibiotic prophylaxis is questionable.
Objective: Evaluate the non-inferiority of omitting antibiotic prophylaxis in MBS. Compare postoperative outcomes between Group A (no antibiotics) and Group B (standard antibiotic care) to determine if omission increases complications, particularly wound infections.
Study Design: Randomized controlled trial (RCT), double-blind.
Study Population: Patients with obesity eligible for MBS.
Intervention:
Main Study Parameters/Endpoints: Compare the incidence of incisional and organ/space SSIs within six weeks post-surgery between Group A and Group B to determine if omitting antibiotics affects infection rates.
Full description
Nature and Extent of the Burden and Risks:
Rationale:
Risk Assessment:
Group Relatedness:
Comparing groups with and without antibiotics provides evi-dence-based insights into the safety of modifying standard practices to optimize health outcomes and resource use.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
° Patients must be older than 18 and meet the eligibility criteria for MBS as outlined by the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO) and the Dutch Federation of Medical Specialists for the surgical treatment of obesity.
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
3,352 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal