Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The APPROPRIATE study will compare differences in functional capacity (peak VO2) between chronotropically incompetent patients randomized to receive rate responsive pacing driven by either the minute ventilation (respiration-based) sensor or an accelerometer (motion-based).
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Mobitz II second degree heart block
Third degree heart block
Chronic atrial fibrillation or uncontrolled atrial arrhythmias within the past 90 days prior to consent
Neuromuscular, orthopedic, or vascular disability that prevents normal walking or weight carrying (e.g., intermittent claudication, arthritis, residual stroke weakness, need for a wheelchair or walker)
A symptom-limited exercise protocol is thought to be dangerous or contra-indicated, including but not limited to changing pattern of chest discomfort or uncontrolled arrhythmias
Pulmonary disease as defined by any one of the following:
Life expectancy is less than 12 months due to other medical conditions, per physician discretion
Has or indicated for an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) or cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D)
Currently enrolled in another investigational study that would directly impact the treatment or outcome of the current study.
Younger than 18 years of age
Pregnant or planning to become pregnant during the study (method of assessment upon physician's discretion)
Unable or unwilling to comply with the protocol requirements
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
566 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal