Are Superficial Parasternal Intercostal Plane (SPIP) Blocks With Bupivacaine and With or Without Transversus Abdominis Plane Block (TAP) Helpful for Post-operative Pain After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting?

Wayne State University

Status: Unknown

Conditions: Post-operative Pain Management

Treatments: Procedure: SPIP and TAP Block; Procedure: SPIP Block

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT05090735

SPIP and TAP in CABG

Details and patient eligibility

About

The purpose of this study is to determine whether superficial parasternal intercostal plane (SPIP) block alone or with transverses abdominis plane (TAP) block can improve post-operative pain in patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery, specifically, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

Full description

Postoperative pain management remains an important clinical challenge in cardiothoracic surgery. Inadequate postoperative pain control can have adverse pathophysiologic consequences, including increased myocardial oxygen demand, hypoventilation, suboptimal clearance of pulmonary secretions, acute respiratory failure, and decreased mobility, with associated increased risks for formation of clots in a blood vessels (thromboembolism). These adverse events may result in greater perioperative morbidity and mortality. Despite several multimodal approaches to postoperative pain control, optimal pain management after cardiothoracic procedures remains an issue.

Regional anesthesia is used to block sensation in a specific part of body during and after surgery. It offers numerous advantages over conventional general anesthesia, including faster recovery time, fewer side effects, no need for an airway device during surgery, and a dramatic reduction in post-surgical pain and reduction in opioid use following surgery. The use of local anesthetic peripheral nerve blocks for surgical anesthesia and postoperative pain management has increased significantly with the advent of ultrasound-guided techniques.

Ultrasound has revolutionized regional anesthesia by allowing real-time visualization of anatomical structures, needle advancement and local anesthetic (LA) spread. This has led not only to refinement of existing techniques, but also the introduction of new ones.

In particular, ultrasound has been critical in the development of fascial plane blocks, in which local anesthetic (LA) is injected into a tissue plane rather than directly around nerves. These blocks are believed to work via passive spread of LA to nerves traveling within that tissue plane, or to adjacent tissue compartments containing nerves.

Although research into these techniques is still at an early stage, the available evidence indicates that they are effective in reducing opioid requirements and improving the pain experience in a wide range of clinical settings. They are best employed as part of multimodal analgesia with other systemic analgesics, rather than as sole anesthetic techniques. Catheters may be beneficial in situations where moderate-severe pain is expected for >12 hours, although the optimal dosing regimen requires further investigation.

In this study the investigators will focus on the superficial parasternal-intercostal plane (SPIP) block and the transverses abdomens plane (TAP) block.

The investigators will compare the SPIP block administered alone and with a TAP block; the investigators will measure the visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores in the first 24 hours after surgery, total post-operative opioid consumption (oral morphine equivalents), total acetaminophen and ketorolac consumption, post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV), length of the ICU stay, time to extubation, and length of hospital stay to determine if one technique is superior to the other.

Enrollment: 100 estimated patients

Sex: All

Ages: 18 to 100 years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Patients undergoing primary coronary artery bypass grafting

Exclusion criteria

• Patients with significant genetic or acquired clotting/bleeding disorders (hemophilia, DIC, etc.)
• Patients with significant platelet dysfunction
• Infection at site for regional anesthesia
• Allergy to local anesthetics
• Severe aortic stenosis
• Severe mitral stenosis
• Sepsis

Trial design

Primary purpose: Supportive Care

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: Double Blind

---

100 participants in 2 patient groups

SPIP Block

Active Comparator group

Description:

50 Patients-Post-operatively patients will receive bilateral SPIP blocks by injecting 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine (on each side) between the pectoralis major and external intercostal muscle aponeurosis at 2 cm lateral to the right and left of the sternal edge, corresponding to the fifth rib.

Treatment:

Procedure: SPIP Block

SPIP Block with TAP Block

Active Comparator group

Description:

50 Patients-Post-operatively patients will receive bilateral SPIP blocks by injecting 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine (on each side) between the pectoralis major and external intercostal muscle aponeurosis at 2 cm lateral to the right and left of the sternal edge, corresponding to the fifth rib. This group of patients will also receive unilateral TAP block by injecting 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine in the plane between the internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscles.

Treatment:

Procedure: SPIP and TAP Block