ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Are There Different Objective Fixation Disparity Values for Two Different Test Paradigms

U

University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland

Status

Completed

Conditions

Vision Disparity

Treatments

Other: different test paradigms

Study type

Observational

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT02735278
T426-0034-2

Details and patient eligibility

About

In optometry, binocular coordination is measured subjectively. The result is subjective fixation disparity. In research different experiments have proven, that subjective and objective fixation disparity are different. A binocular eyetracker has to be calibrated. There are two well known calibration methods: associated and dissociated calibration. Objective fixation disparity is measured in arcMin. Therefore, the precision of the eyetracker plays a crucial role. Now, the investigators try to compare dissociated calibration with polarized filters and associated calibration under different test paradigms.

Enrollment

24 patients

Sex

All

Ages

17 to 40 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • VA without glasses/contact lenses 0.63
  • Accurate accommodation on 57cm

Exclusion criteria

  • Tiredness at day of investigation
  • Presbyopia
  • Alcohol or drug abuse
  • No eye related pathology
  • No strabism
  • No known epilepsy-attack in family

Trial contacts and locations

0

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems