ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Arthroscopic Assisted CC Stabilization Alone VS Additional K-wire Fixation for Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Injury

Q

Queen Savang Vadhana Memorial Hospital, Thailand

Status

Enrolling

Conditions

Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation

Treatments

Device: K-wire

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT05844098
Interventional (Other Identifier)

Details and patient eligibility

About

This RCT study is designed for comparing functional outcomes and radioligic outcomes between intervention group (Arthroscopic assisted CC-stabilzation with additional K-wire fixation) and control group (Arthroscopic assisted CC-stabilzation alone) for acute ACJI.

The main question it aims to answer is:

  • Does Arthroscopic assisted CC-stabilization with additional K-wire fixation provide different outcomes in functional outcomes, CC-distance and GACA difference compare with arthroscopic assisted CC-stabilization alone in acute acromioclavicular joint injury?

Full description

Acromioclavicular joint injury (ACJI) is one of the most common injury of shoulder joint. Most common mechanism of injury is from direct force apply to the affected shoulder, in adduction position, in acromion process area. Most of the intervention that have been used for treat ACJI are focused on pain control, maintain the strength of the joint, no limitation in daily life activity and full range of motion of affected shoulder. Operative treatment is indicated in ACJI Rockwood classification grade III, IV, V, and VI. Nowadays there are over 60 surgical techniques without gold standard. Arthroscopic assisted CC-stabilzation is one of the most popular technique that has been used for ACJI.

This RCT study is designed for comparing functional outcomes (ACJI score, VAS, Constant score and DASH score) and radioligic outcomes (CC-distance difference, GACA difference) between intervention group (Arthroscopic assisted CC-stabilzation with additional K-wire fixation) and control group (Arthroscopic assisted CC-stabilzation alone) for acute ACJI.

The main question it aims to answer is:

  • Does Arthroscopic assisted CC-stabilization with additional K-wire fixation provide different outcomes in functional outcomes, CC-distance and GACA difference compare with arthroscopic assisted CC-stabilization alone in acute acromioclavicular joint injury?

Enrollment

20 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 45 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18-45 years old
  • Acute AC joint injury rockwood classification III, IV and V

Exclusion criteria

  • History of underwent previous ipsilateral shoulder surgery
  • Specific active associated ipsilateral injury (Rib fractures, clavicel fractures, scapula fractures and base of coracoid fractures)
  • Onset of injury more than 3 weeks
  • Cannot underwent arthroscopic assisted CC-stabilization surgery

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

20 participants in 2 patient groups

With K-wire
Experimental group
Description:
arthroscopic assisted CC-stabilization with K-wire
Treatment:
Device: K-wire
No K-wire
No Intervention group
Description:
arthroscopic assisted CC-stabilization

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Nachapong Sithiwichankit, M.D; Surasak Srimongkolpitak, M.D

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems