Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Multicentric prospective clinical and radiological comparative study of consecutive patients with irreparable rotator cuff tears to test the hypothesis that there are significant differences in the improvement of the clinical and imaging outcomes of arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (ASCR) when a different type of graft is used.
Full description
Patients with irreparable rotator cuff tears who meet the eligibility criteria will be enrolled in the study and undergo arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction using one of the following types of graft: fascia lata autograft, fascia lata allograft, Achilles tendon allograft, bovine pericardium xenograft, swine dermal xenograft, or collagen graft.
All patients will be assessed clinically, radiologically and with an MRI preoperatively and at the 6-months and at the 2-years postoperative evaluations. The range of motion (ROM), shoulder abduction strength, Constant (CS), simple shoulder test (SST) and subjective shoulder value (SSV) scores will be compared from preoperative to 6 months postoperative; from 6 months postoperative to 2 years postoperative (paired-samples t-test, two-tailed) in each group (allotment to groups is performed according to the type of graft used: fascia lata autograft, fascia lata allograft, Achilles tendon allograft, bovine pericardium xenograft, swine dermal xenograft, or collagen graft). The differences in ROM, shoulder abduction strength, CS, SST and SSV scores from preoperative to 6 months postoperative and from 6 months postoperative to 2 years postoperative will be compared between groups. All continuous variables will be compared between the group of patients with graft tears and the group without graft tears (Mann-Whitney U test). All categorical variables and outcome results will be compared between groups (Fisher's exact test). A significant difference will be defined as P<0.05.
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
0 participants in 6 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal