Articaine Versus Lidocaine Buccal Infiltration

Fayoum University

Status and phase: Active, not recruiting; Phase 2

Conditions: Pain

Treatments: Drug: lidocaine local anethesia with vasoconstrictor; Drug: articaine local anethesia with vasoconstrictor

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT05223075

256-06/2018

Details and patient eligibility

About

assess the effect of articaine versus lidocaine in only buccal infiltration of local anethesia in lower anterior teeth

Enrollment: 31 estimated patients

Sex: All

Ages: 18+ years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• medically stable
• 18years or older
• patient with bilateral lower anterior teeth requiring non surgical removal

Exclusion criteria

• grade 3 mobility
• neurological disease
• allergy to anethesia

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: Quadruple Blind

---

31 participants in 2 patient groups

articaine group

Experimental group

Treatment:

Drug: articaine local anethesia with vasoconstrictor

lidocaine group

Experimental group

Treatment:

Drug: lidocaine local anethesia with vasoconstrictor