ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Artificial Intelligence as a Decision Making Tool in Neurology

R

Rambam Health Care Campus

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Emergency Department Visit
Neurological Diseases or Conditions
Medical Reporting
Clinical Decision-making

Treatments

Other: Retrospective Data Extraction of 10,000 Neurology ER Cases
Other: Artificial Intelligence

Study type

Observational

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06902675
0026-24RMB

Details and patient eligibility

About

Background: The establishment of neuroinformatics as a distinct field has enabled the integration of computational biology and informatics to improve neurological research. This interdisciplinary approach enhances the capacity to integrate diverse datasets, unravel complex neural networks, and develop computational models that can improve clinical management. The investigators aim to evaluate whether an artificial-intelligence-based tool is effective in non-English-speaking regions.

Hypothesis: Integrating a language model-based clinical assistance system within the neurology ward will significantly enhance the efficiency and accuracy of patient care by leveraging neuroinformatics principles. The investigators hypothesize that combining natural language processing and data analytics will improve diagnostic and treatment processes.

Full description

Research Design:

A pre-post-intervention design will be used, measuring outcomes before and after the implementation of a neuroinformatics-driven clinical assistance system. Changes in diagnostic accuracy, treatment decisions, and workflow efficiency will be quantified.

Workflow:

  1. A neurologist evaluates each patient, and the patient signs informed consent.
  2. A medical student manually uploads de-identified clinical information to a secure interface.
  3. Data are analyzed by a large language model (LLM) system through a hospital-approved application.
  4. A senior physician must approve any decision based on the LLM's recommendation.
  5. For half of the prospectively enrolled participants, the LLM's recommendation is presented to the resident.

Retrospective Data:

  1. The investigators will extract data from 10,000 patients who were evaluated by a neurologist in the Emergency Department.
  2. Clinical information (without patient identifiers) will be uploaded to a secure, hospital-approved LLM with a security key.
  3. The model's output will be compared with actual clinical decisions and patient outcomes (e.g., mortality, discharge status).

Enrollment

1,000 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 120 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Unable to give informed consent

Trial design

1,000 participants in 3 patient groups

Evaluation With AI
Description:
* Description: Participants in this arm receive an LLM-based recommendation that is presented to the resident (after senior physician approval) given by random selection (control versus study) 1:1. * Intervention: Artificial Intelligence as a Decision-Making Tool * Intervention Description: The large language model (LLM) provides clinical suggestions regarding diagnosis or management. The final decision remains at the discretion of the attending physician.
Treatment:
Other: Artificial Intelligence
Evaluation Without AI
Description:
* Description: Participants in this arm receive standard clinical care without access to an AI-based recommendation given by random selection (control versus study) 1:1 to the neurological resident. * Intervention: No Intervention * Intervention Description: Standard of care only. No AI tool is provided to the resident.
Retrospective Cohort
Description:
* Description: Clinical data from 10,000 patients previously evaluated by neurologists in the Emergency Department are extracted and analyzed retrospectively. * Intervention: Data Extraction and Analysis * Intervention Description: De-identified data are uploaded into the LLM for retrospective analysis. Model outputs are then compared to actual patient outcomes and standard-of-care decisions.
Treatment:
Other: Retrospective Data Extraction of 10,000 Neurology ER Cases

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems