Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Title: A single-center, retrospective randomized controlled trial of artificial intelligence (AI) versus expert endoscopists for diagnosis of gastric cancer in patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Précis: this single-center, retrospective randomized controlled trial will include 500 outpatients who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for gastric cancer screening and will compare the diagnostic detection rate for gastric cancer of AI and expert endoscopists.
Objectives Primary Objective: to evaluate the diagnostic detection rate for gastric cancer of AI and expert endoscopists.
Secondary Objectives: to determine whether AI is not inferior to expert endoscopists in terms of the number of images analyzed for diagnosis of gastric cancer and intersection over union (IOU), and the detection rate of diagnosis of early and advanced gastric cancer.
Endpoints Primary Endpoint: diagnosis of gastric cancer. Secondary Endpoints: image based diagnosis of gastric cancer and IOU. Population: in total, 500 males and females aged ≥ 20 years who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for screening of gastric cancer at a single hospital in Japan.
Describe the Intervention: AI-based diagnosis of gastric cancer based on upper gastrointestinal endoscopy images.
Study Duration: 3 months.
Full description
Prior to Study: Total 500: Screen potential subjects by inclusion and exclusion criteria; obtain endoscopy images.
Randomization was performed.
Intervention: AI diagnosis was performed for 250 patients using upper gastrointestinal endoscopy images, and Expert endoscopists diagnosis was performed for 250 patients by same methods.
Primary analysis: Perform primary analysis of primary and secondary endpoints for 250 patients in each group
Cross over diagnosis between AI and expert endoscopists was performed.
Perform secondary analysis of agreement of gastric cancer diagnosis per images and IOU between AI and expert endoscopists for 500 patients.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
500 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal