Status
Conditions
About
The study evaluates the impact of qXR-LN compared to standard radiologist-only interpretations before and after AI deployment. The goal is to compare how well lung nodules and cancers are detected in two time periods: before and after the implementation of the AI tool in routine clinical practice. The study aims to determine whether the AI system can help radiologists identify more actionable lung nodules and diagnose lung cancer earlier, ultimately improving patient outcomes.
No changes will be made to patients' standard care, and all treatment decisions will be based on the clinical judgment of physicians. The study includes patients over 35 years old who undergo chest X-rays for various medical reasons, excluding those with known lung cancer.
Full description
This study evaluates the clinical impact of the FDA-cleared artificial intelligence (AI) tool, qXR-LN, for detecting lung nodules and diagnosing lung cancer using chest X-rays (CXR). The study employs an ambispective observational cohort design with two cohorts: pre-deployment (before AI implementation) and post-deployment (after AI implementation).
The primary objective is to assess differences in lung nodule detection rates and the percentage of lung cancers diagnosed through the nodule pathway between the two cohorts. Secondary objectives include evaluating whether the AI tool aids in detecting more early-stage lung cancers and identifying reasons for patients dropping out of the nodule clinic pathway.
In the post-deployment cohort, qXR-LN integrates seamlessly with the hospital's existing systems to provide real-time AI findings on radiologists' workstations. Radiologists can accept or reject AI suggestions, ensuring that the final decisions remain under human supervision. Data from both cohorts, including patient demographics, nodule detection rates, cancer diagnoses, and treatment outcomes, will be collected and analyzed.
The study excludes patients under 35 years old and those with known lung cancer at the time of imaging. Ethical considerations include obtaining waivers of consent where applicable and ensuring minimal risk to participants. The findings of this study aim to inform clinical practices and enhance the use of AI tools in lung cancer screening and diagnosis.
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
0 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Mohammad Reza Hosseini Siyanaki, Medical Doctor
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal