Assessment of Efficacy of Prebent Titanium Mesh Versus Customized Poly-ether Ether Ketone Mesh for Three Dimensional Augmentation in Deficient Maxillary Ridge. a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Basma Alsheikh

Status: Completed

Conditions: Deficient Alveolar Bone

Treatments: Procedure: ti mesh; Procedure: 3d peek mesh

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT07040124

1125486

Details and patient eligibility

About

In conclusion, the choice between titanium and PEEK meshes should consider patient-specific factors, clinical requirements, and surgeon expertise. The PEEK mesh, with its patient customized design enabled by CAD/CAM technology, offers significant advantages, including greater gained bone volume and reduced operative time. Its tailored fabrication ensures precise adaptation to the patient's anatomy, effectively maintaining the space required for optimal bone formation. The integration of such advanced technologies in regenerative procedures represents a significant step forward in achieving predictable outcomes and enhancing patient care. However, continued innovation and evaluation are crucial to refine these approaches and expand their applicability in oral rehabilitation

Enrollment: 8 patients

Sex: All

Ages: 18 to 70 years old

Volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• 1. Adult patient of both sexes presenting with partially edentulous maxillary ridge with horizontal bone defect. 2. The horizontal ridge dimension measured 2mm below the alveolar crest should range from 2-5 mm. 3. No local pathosis that may interfere with bone healing. 4. Good oral hygiene. 5. Age between 20-65 years old.

Exclusion criteria

• Patient taking any medication that may interfere with normal bone physiology or impair bone healing. 2. All patients suffering from any systemic disease that may affect bone healing. 3. Heavy smokers (more than 10 cigarette per day) 4. Patients with parafunctional habits such as bruxism and clenching 5. Poor interest and cooperation from the patient. 6. Patients that have undergone any horizontal augmentation procedure at the site of interest

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: Double Blind

---

8 participants in 2 patient groups

prebent titanium mesh

Active Comparator group

Description:

participants receive alveolar ridge augmentation using pre-bent titanium mesh

Treatment:

Procedure: ti mesh

3d peek mesh

Active Comparator group

Description:

participants receive maxillary ridge augmentation using 3d milled peek mesh

Treatment:

Procedure: 3d peek mesh