Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
About
Placing implants immediately after tooth extraction offers several advantages such as preventing bone resorption, maintaining alveolar crest width and height, reducing surgical procedures and treatment time, in addition to good esthetic results. Immediate implant placement after tooth extraction is often associated with a residual gap between the implant surface and the residual bone walls. Osseointegration between the implant surface and the surrounding osseous walls of the extraction socket should increase using materials that promote new bone formation. Since both melatonin and hyaluronic acid are thought to have a positive effect on increasing osseointegration and decreasing inflammation of the tissues; the investigators want to test if adding a mix of hyaluronic acid and melatonin to immediately implant, will give a better implant stability, decreased peri-implant bone loss and decreased post-operative pain versus immediate implant placement without adding any material.
Full description
Oral rehabilitation with dental implants has become an established therapy in the past decades. Installation of implants in extraction sockets was advocated for to reduce the number of surgical procedures, time between tooth removal and installation of implant supported restoration, and to preserve the dimensions of alveolar ridge.
Scientific evidence exists demonstrating that early implantation may preserve the alveolar anatomy and that the placement of a fixture in a fresh extraction socket may help to maintain the bony crest structure. Fresh extraction sockets offer better opportunities for bone regeneration because of their particularly elevated healing potential.
Implant stability is directly related to the percentage of the bone to implant contact area (BIC). Studies had reported that osseointegration occurs following immediate implant installation in extraction sockets despite presence of marginal gap between bone and implant surface up to 4 mm. Different approaches have been introduced lately to positively enhance the healing around dental implants. One approach to enhance osseointegration of dental implants is the coating with organic components of the extracellular matrix. Recent studies have shown promising results using different organic surface modifications on dental implants, such as glycosaminoglycans, collagen and Hyaluronic acid.
Hyaluronic acid (HA) is a naturally occurring non-sulfated glycosaminoglycans which plays a role in the inflammatory process and wound healing of mineralized and non-mineralized tissues of the periodontium including granulation tissue formation and tissue remodeling. It also supports the structural and homeostatic integrity of tissues regulating properties as osmotic pressure and tissue lubrication.
It was found that coating the implants with low sulfated HA increased peri-implant bone formation around dental implants in maxillary bone compared to uncoated implants in early healing period. Another study proved that application of 1% HA associated with a collagen scaffold can improve bone formation in critical-size defects.
Furthermore, Melatonin (N-acetyl-5-methoxy tryptamine) is a substance secreted by multiple organs including the pineal gland, retina, bone marrow, the gastro-intestinal tract and the immune system. It plays an anti-inflammatory, anti-oncotic, and immunomodulatory role by scavenging free-radicals and by interacting with cell membrane and intracellular proteins. It was found to have a positive effect on new bone formation around implants as it promotes osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. Experimental evidence suggests that topical application of melatonin may be useful in oral surgery and implant dentistry, increasing BIC values and new bone formation, and so improving the success and long-term survival of the implants.
Explanation for choice of comparators:
Since both melatonin and hyaluronic acid are thought to have a positive effect on increasing osseointegration and decreasing inflammation of the tissues, the synergistic effect of both materials on the following outcomes will be investigated; implant stability, decreasing the horizontal dimensional bone loss around the implant and post-operative pain.
Aim of the study:
This study aims at assessing the effect of adding a mixture of hyaluronic acid and melatonin to the implant surface in immediate implants; regarding implant stability, peri-implant horizontal bone changes and post-operative pain, in comparison to immediate implant placement without adding any materials.
The primary objective:
Measuring the implant stability in immediate implants with hyaluronic acid and melatonin mixture, versus immediate implants placed without adding any materials.
The secondary objective:
Measuring the peri-implant horizontal bony changes and post-operative pain with topical application of hyaluronic acid and melatonin mixture to immediately placed implants, versus immediate implant placement without addition of any materials.
Trial design:
Methods:
A) Participants, interventions & outcomes
. Study settings: The study will be carried out on patients attending the outpatient clinics in Oral Medicine, Diagnosis and Periodontology Department- Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Cairo University-Egypt.
. Eligibility criteria:
Inclusion criteria 1. Age: 18-60 years old. 2. Patients with single non-restorable teeth in the inter-bicuspid area. 3. Patients with adequate bone volume for the dental implant procedure. 4. Patients who are compliant to oral hygiene measures. 5. Patients accepting to sign an informed consent to undergo the treatment.
Exclusion criteria:
Heavy smokers.
Systemic disease that contraindicates implant placement or surgical procedures.
No or poor patient's compliance.
Psychological problems.
Periapical pathosis at the site of intervention.
Pregnant females.
Preoperative measures (for both study and control groups): (T0)
Surgical phase (T1):
The main investigator will perform all procedures under local anesthesia (4% articaine with 1/200 000 adrenaline Solution) (Ubistesin forte 3M ESPE AG, ESPE Platz, D-82229 Seefeld, Germany), using a local infiltration technique for maxillary teeth or nerve block technique for mandibular teeth.
A loading dose of 2 capsules of Antibiotic 875 mg of Amoxicillin and 125 mg of Clavulanic acid (2 X 1 gm Amoxicillin Clavulanate) will be given orally to the patient 1 hour before the procedure.
Minimally invasive extraction of the intended tooth will be performed using Periotome (Nordent,REPC N15, US) to preserve the alveolar bone integrity, followed by irrigation of the socket with sterile saline solution and curettage to remove any remnants of the periodontal ligaments or pocket tissue.
Intervention for study group (Group A):
Melatonin and hyaluronic acid mixture will be prepared (pure melatonin will be purchased from pure bulk supplements and prepared as 5% oral gel at El-Ezaby pharmacy. Hyaluronic acid will be used in the gel form Gingigel also from El Ezaby pharmacy) The produced mixture will be added to the implant surface, into the extraction socket and in the peri-implant area.
Implant will be inserted in site by flapless surgery.
Primary implant stability will be measured at the day of surgery and 6 months after surgery using Ostell.
Simple interrupted suture with a 5-a silk suture to approximate the labial/buccal and lingual/palatal tissues.
Intervention for control group (Group B):
Implant will be placed as in manufacturer instruction. 5. Primary implant stability will be measured at the day of surgery and 6 months after surgery using Ostell.
Simple interrupted suture with a 5-a silk suture to approximate the labial/buccal and lingual/palatal tissues.
Post-operative care: (T2) 1. Sutures will be removed after 10 days. 2. Patients in both groups will receive restoration after implant being osseointegrated.
Follow-up (T0, T1, T2):
Patients will be recalled for follow up after 10 days, then every month to check on the healing of the implantation site without complications (dehiscence, inflammation, excessive pain), and to ensure that they are following proper oral hygiene measures.
At the same day of surgery, implant stability will be measured using Ostell (T1).
After 10 days, following suture removal, post-operative pain will be assessed using the Numerical scale of pain (NRS).
After six months, implant stability will be measured again (T2) for all patients in both groups. Also, all patients will do a CBCT to compare peri-implant horizontal bony changes.
Prosthetic phase (T3):
After 6 months, implant exposure will be performed under local anaesthesia, and healing collars will be placed for 1 week before being replaced by the permanent abutment (T3).
Impressions (Express, 3M ESPE, 3 M Corporate Headquarters, Maplewood, Minnesota) will be taken and fixed prosthesis will be fabricated accordingly.
Outcomes:
Primary outcome:
Implant stability quotient (ISQ) will be measured using Ostell, at the time of surgery (T1) and after 6 months (T2).
Secondary outcomes:
Peri-implant horizontal bone changes: Peri-implant horizontal bone measurements in mm will be taken from pre-operative CBCT (T0) and post-osseointegration CBCT (T2) to assess the change in the horizontal bone dimensions of the peri-implant area between the two groups.
Post-operative pain: Post-operative pain will be recorded for all patients using the Numerical scale (NRS) of pain to compare between the values obtained for the study group and those for the control group.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
.18-60 years old. .single non-restorable teeth in the inter-bicuspid area. .adequate bone volume for the dental implant procedure. .compliant to oral hygiene measures. .accepting to sign an informed consent to undergo the treatment.
Exclusion criteria
.Heavy smokers. .Systemic disease that contraindicates implant placement or surgical procedures.
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
24 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Azza M Nasr, MSc
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal