Assessment of Shoulder Rehabilitation Practices and Documentation Protocols at Riphah Rehabilitation Center

Riphah International University

Status: Completed

Conditions: Shoulder Pain; Rotator Cuff Injury; Shoulder Impingement

Treatments: Other: Rehabilitation Practices Group; Other: Documentation Protocols Group

Study type: Observational

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT06773442

REC/RCR&AHS24/37

Details and patient eligibility

About

This study aims to evaluate Riphah Rehabilitation Center's shoulder rehabilitation procedures and documentation guidelines. The study will specifically assess the efficacy of shoulder rehabilitation procedures, their methodology, and the techniques employed to record patient improvement. In order to make sure the centre adheres to best practices, improves patient care, and keeps accurate records for better treatment outcomes, the study intends to identify areas of strength and potential improvements in both the rehabilitation techniques and documentation processes. The evaluation's findings will improve the center's operational effectiveness and clinical practices.

Target Audience:Healthcare Professionals (such as physicians, physiotherapists, and rehabilitation therapists): This study will assist guide evidence-based strategies for managing shoulder injuries and offer insights into contemporary rehabilitation procedures.

Centre Administration: For better patient care, resource management, and operational efficiency, the results will point out areas where documentation and treatment protocols should be strengthened.

Patients and Families: In the end, the study will improve rehabilitation results, increasing the likelihood that patients will heal from shoulder injuries more quickly and completely.

Enrollment: 20 patients

Sex: All

Ages: 23 to 50 years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Patients undergoing shoulder rehabilitation at Rphah Rehabilitation Center.
• Rehabilitation protocols implemented within the center.
• Documented cases with sufficient information for analysis.
• Both acute and chronic shoulder conditions

Exclusion criteria

• Patients with shoulder conditions not requiring rehabilitation.
• Cases lacking adequate documentation.
• Rehabilitation protocols not specific to shoulder conditions.
• Patients with comorbidities significantly affecting rehabilitation outcomes.

Trial design

20 participants in 2 patient groups

GROUP A:Rehabilitation Practices Group:

Description:

Objective: Evaluate the effectiveness and quality of shoulder rehabilitation practices. Data Collection, Observation of rehabilitation sessions: Record types of exercises, therapy techniques, patient engagement, and therapist-patient interactions. Interviews with rehabilitation professionals: Gather insights into their approaches, challenges faced, and perceived effectiveness of rehabilitation strategies. Analysis: Assess adherence to established rehabilitation protocols. Evaluate patient outcomes such as pain levels, range of motion, and functional status. Compare observed practices with evidence-based guidelines for shoulder rehabilitation. Findings: Identify strengths and weaknesses in current rehabilitation practices. Highlight areas where improvements or modifications may be necessary.

Treatment:

Other: Rehabilitation Practices Group

GROUP B:Documentation Protocols Group

Description:

Objective: Assess the completeness, accuracy, and organization of documentation related to shoulder rehabilitation. Data Collection: Review of patient records and documentation: Evaluate the quality and consistency of documentation practices, including initial evaluations, progress notes, and discharge summaries. Interviews with rehabilitation staff: Collect feedback on documentation protocols, challenges encountered, and perceived adequacy of documentation practices. Analysis: Assess the clarity and comprehensiveness of documentation. Evaluate adherence to documentation protocols and standards. Identify any deficiencies or inconsistencies in documentation practices. Findings: Highlight strengths and weaknesses in current documentation protocols. Identify areas for improvement, such as standardizing documentation templates or providing training on effective documentation practices. Recommendations: Propose strategies to enhance documentation quality and consistency.

Treatment:

Other: Documentation Protocols Group