ASSESSMENT OF SOFT TISSUE HEALING OVER IMMEDIATELY PLACED IMPLANT SEALED WITH PLATELETS RICH FIBRIN (PRF) VERSUS DIODE LASER

Nourhan M.Aly

Status

Completed

Conditions

Immediate Implant Soft Tissue Healing

Treatments

Biological: Platelet Rich Fibrin

Device: Diode laser

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT05517733

Details and patient eligibility

About

Aim of the current study was to assess the efficacy of PRF in comparison to diode laser to promote tissue healing and soft tissue quality after placement of immediate implants.

Enrollment

16 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 50 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

Any non-restorable hopeless tooth: a badly decayed tooth that cannot be restored, tooth with failed endodontic treatment, and teeth with longitudinal fracture.
Post-extraction sockets type 1 with all bony walls intact; Type I extraction sockets according to Elian classification in 2007 have an intact labial plate of the bone and no soft tissue recession. Therefore, it does not require a mucoperiosteal flap elevation, only bone graft particles are packed into the socket after atraumatic extraction and socket debridement, then sealed with barrier membranes or soft tissue grafts.
No signs of active periodontal disease in the selected tooth.
Good oral hygiene

Exclusion criteria

The presence of any systemic disease could complicate bone or soft tissue healing after immediate implant placement.
The presence of Acute periapical infection.
The presence of any local factor that may interfere with extraction as tooth ankyloses
Subjects who had undergone therapeutical radiation. (187)
Patients who had been subjected to or who were under bisphosphonate therapy