ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Assessment of the Accuracy of Surgical Guide Designed From Dental Model Optical Scan Versus Impression Inversion With Markers Techniques in Computer Guided Implantology. Randomized Clinical Trial.

Cairo University (CU) logo

Cairo University (CU)

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Accuracy of Surgical Guide in Computer Guided Implantology

Treatments

Other: Surgical guide designed from Impression inversion with markers

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT03367949
SGCBCTELMASRY

Details and patient eligibility

About

Dental model cast accuracy can be affected by many variables as tray material, impression material and time elapsed before pouring the impression. All these factors would affect the accuracy of the surgical guide

Impression inversion with markers technique avoids the dimension changes that may happen from pouring of the dental model cast. Also it saves time as no need for optical scan of the model cast and for scan appliance even in cases of multiple restoration. Adding markers to impression tray ensures an accurate merge even if the patient has restored dentition that may cause scatter during the CT/CBCT scan.

This study will is for Assessment of the Accuracy of Surgical Guide designed from Dental Model Optical Scan versus Impression Inversion with Markers techniques in Computer Guided Implantology.

Enrollment

10 estimated patients

Sex

All

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Partially Edentulous patients seeking for dental implants

  2. Patients with Bucco-lingual bone thickness more than 6 mm allowing flapless implant placement.

  3. Medically free patients.

    Exclusion Criteria:

1- Patients with thin ridges. 2- Patients with systemic disease that may affect bone quality. 3- Patients with poor oral hygiene and active periodontal diseases. 4- Anatomical situations requiring regenerative procedure. 5- Completely edentulous patient 6-Patient with limited mouth opening

Trial design

Primary purpose

Other

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Quadruple Blind

10 participants in 2 patient groups

Accuracy of surgical guide from Model optical scan
No Intervention group
Accuracy of surgical guide from Impression inversion Technique
Active Comparator group
Treatment:
Other: Surgical guide designed from Impression inversion with markers

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems