ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Assessment of the Socket Shield Technique Accompanied by Sticky Bone Around the Immediate Implant

R

Reham Qabeel

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Immediate Implant

Treatments

Procedure: Immediate implant and sticky bone
Procedure: SOCKET SHIELD

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06700486
P-ME-22-02

Details and patient eligibility

About

challenge of the implant of esthetic zone with buccal plate of bone width less than 2mm become available by the using of socket shield technique used with the immediate implant this technique provide improvement of the width of buccal plate of bone which improve esthetic outcome bot the jumping gape still a questionable area between the shield and the implant which required to be filled with biological filling to improve osteointegration and stability of the implant such as sticky bone ,bone mixed with injectable PRF , PRF also has antibacterial ,anti-inflammatory effect and regenerative effect which could help.

Full description

Biological mechanisms involved in the healing of the periodontal tissues after tooth extraction can cause the loss of the periodontal ligament and its vascular support. The physiological process can lead to esthetic problems that are difficult to resolve by methods of restoration that are able to preserve the emergence profile, especially in the anterior region . Therefore, preserving and maintaining the bone anatomy and soft tissue architecture in the anterior region is essential for maintaining esthetics restorations .

Teeth extractions basis volumetric changes characterized by alveolar bone resorption, specifically the buccal plate of bone, with a consequential associated soft tissue retraction . Several studies proved that buccal dimension of the alveolar ridge undergoes horizontal bone resorption of about 56% and a resorption of the palatal /lingual bone of 30% through the interval four-month prior extraction of the tooth. Correspondingly . detected overall horizontal dimension resorption of the alveolar ridge subsequent the extraction, and the buccal wall reduction of the alveolar ridge is more obvious than lingual wall .

Immediate placement of implant does not totally overcome the resorption of the alveolar bone and recession of the soft tissue in esthetic region following teeth extractions. Loss of alveolar bone prior extraction consider as irreversible process concerning both vertical and horizontal resorption. Moreover, the alveolar bone resorption is more distinct on the buccal wall than on the lingual wall of the extraction socket.

The ridge dimension is reduced when implants are placed immediately without subsequent directed bone regeneration treatments. When compared to spontaneous healing, it appears to be ineffective at around half of the initial bone width in horizontal dimension . By using a grafting substance and combining instantaneous implant insertion with a guided bone-regeneration process, less horizontal bone resorption can be expected .

Several augmentation techniques are used in the surgical field to create sufficient bone volume. Grafting techniques for particulate bone augmentation include autograft, allograft, xenograft, and alloplast. Autograft is the gold standard in bone augmentation, but it has drawbacks such as second surgical-site morbidity and insufficient bone volume. Secondary infections are a disadvantage of allografts and xenografts Since 2010, a novel method of producing growth factor-enriched bone graft matrix (also known as sticky bone) with autologous fibrin glue has been demonstrated. Sticky bone stabilizes the bone graft in the defect, accelerating tissue healing and minimizing bone loss during the healing period. It is moldable and adaptable to a variety of bony defects, preventing micro and macro movement of the grafted bone. As a result, the volume of the augmentation is maintained during the healing process, and the need of titanium mesh and bone block is reduced .

In contrast to PRP or PRGF, the fibrin network entraps platelets and leukocytes to release growth factors, speeding up soft tissue regeneration and bone regeneration. Furthermore, unlike PRP or PRGF, no biochemical additives are required to make sticky bone, and fibrin interconnection reduces soft tissue ingrowth into the sticky bone graft .

Studies revealed that the presence of vascular supply from the periodontal ligament was a major factor in the preservation of alveolar bone and soft tissues, the idea of leaving the leftover root section on the labial plate was advocated. This procedure is known as "socket shield technology" in which the root fragment acts as a shield to protect the buccal bone from resorption

Enrollment

16 patients

Sex

All

Ages

20 to 60 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

    1. Patients having at least single tooth into esthetic zone indicated for extraction and immediate implant placement.
  1. patient with adequate oral hygiene and systemically free. 3.patients' age ranging from 20-60 years. 4. Free from any systemic disease according to Cornell Medical Index

Exclusion criteria

    1. Presence of para-functional habits such as bruxism, clenching, excessive gum chewing, lip or fingernail biting.

    2. Chronic smokers or formal smoker. 3.Insulin dependent diabetes 4.Thyroid disease 5.Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease 6. patients receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy, alcohol or drug abuse 7. Pregnancy and lactation.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Other

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Double Blind

16 participants in 2 patient groups

comparator arm
Active Comparator group
Description:
Immediate implant and sticky bone
Treatment:
Procedure: SOCKET SHIELD
interventional arm
Other group
Description:
Socket shield
Treatment:
Procedure: Immediate implant and sticky bone

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2024 Veeva Systems