Autologous BMA vs Saline and LAM + LP-PRP vs Saline Evaluations in Knee OA (ABLE-OA)

University Health Network, Toronto

Status and phase: Enrolling; Phase 3; Phase 2

Conditions: Osteoarthritis, Knee

Treatments: Biological: Lipoaspirate Micronized + Leukocyte-Poor Platelet-Rich Plasma (LAM + LP-PRP): Minimally manipulated autologous cellular preparations; Biological: Bone Marrow Aspirate (BMA): Minimally manipulated autologous cellular preparation; Other: Saline (Placebo Comparator for LAM + LP-PRP); Other: Saline (Placebo Comparator for BMA)

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT05517434

22-5792 (ABLE OA, study 2) (Other Identifier)

22-5959

Details and patient eligibility

About

ABLE OA is a Health Canada authorized (phase II/III) trial [Parent Control #: 263591]. A multi-center, prospective, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled adaptive trial to evaluate the efficacy of two minimally manipulated autologous cellular preparations i) bone marrow aspirate (BMA) injection; and, ii) combined lipoaspirate micronized (LAM) and leukocyte poor (LP) platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA).

BMA, LAM from lipoaspirate (LA), and LP-PRP from whole blood will be prepared using the Cervos Marrow Cellution™ Bone Marrow Aspiration System, Cervos LIPO-PRO™ Adipose Transfer System, and Cervos KEYPRP Platelet Separator System, respectively.

Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures will be collected using web- or paper-based questionnaires administered at baseline (pre-injection) as well as at 3, 6 and 12 months (post-injection). Blood, synovial fluid, and urine samples will be collected at baseline pre-injection and 6 months post-injection only.

Full description

Trial interventions will occur in two independent studies under a single protocol where each experimental treatment will be compared to a placebo control.

Our primary hypothesis is that BMA or LAM + LP-PRP injection is 35% more effective than placebo saline injection control in terms of response rates in Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) scores as measured by their difference.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

To determine the efficacy of an intra-articular injection of BMA or LAM + LP-PRP in patients with knee OA by comparing each of the two treatments to a placebo saline injection control arm. Efficacy will be measured by a pain intensity improvement of a minimum of 2 points in NPRS scores at 6 months after injection relative to baseline. The study endpoint is 6 months post-injection.

KEY SECONDARY OBJECTIVE:

To determine efficacy measured by improvements in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) function activities of daily living (ADL) subscale scores at 6 months after injection relative to baseline by comparing each of the treatment (BMA or LAM + LP-PRP) arm to a placebo saline control arm.

OTHER SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

• To evaluate if an injection of BMA or LAM + LP-PRP into the knee joint shows greater improvements in other pain outcomes (including KOOS pain) compared to placebo injection at 3, 6 and 12 months post-injection relative to baseline.
• To evaluate the safety of BMA or LAM + LP-PRP injection into the knee joint compared to placebo injection. Adverse events will be collected at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months post-injection, and deleterious effects on the joint will be assessed by X-ray at 6 months post-injection only.
• To evaluate the health profile and overall self-rated health status of patients in treatment and placebo arms at 3, 6 and 12 months post-injection relative to baseline.
• To evaluate overall patient satisfaction in treatment and placebo arms at 6 months post-injection.
• To evaluate health care consumption and health-related productivity losses of paid and unpaid work using the iMTA Medical Consumption Questionnaire (iMCQ) and iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire (iPCQ), respectively at 6 and 12 months post-injection relative to baseline.
• To determine the quality-adjusted-life years (QALYs) using the 5-level EuroQol five-dimensional (EQ-5D-5L) health state utility scores based on the Canadian preference weights to inform cost-effective estimates.

EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:

To determine the correlation between changes in NPRS/KOOS pain scores and KOOS ADL function at 6 months relative to baseline and the heterogeneity in:

1. the cellular composition and soluble factors in BMA, LAM and LP-PRP autologous cellular preparations [in BMA or LAM + LP-PRP groups only]
2. the levels of local and systemic immune cell and inflammatory profiles of patients (based on synovial fluid, blood, and urine readouts) [in BMA or LAM + LP-PRP and placebo groups]

A total of approximately 84 eligible participants in each study will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio, which allows for 42 participants per group (treatment vs. placebo). This sample size considers a potential drop-out rate of 10% for each study. Three recruitment centres (Toronto Western Hospital (TWH), University Health Network (UHN); Women's College Hospital (WCH); Cleveland Clinic Canada (CCC)) and one treatment centre (TWH, UHN) will be involved in these two studies. Stratification will occur by centre, baseline NPRS of 4-6 (moderate pain) or 7-10 (severe pain), and KL grade of 2 (minimal OA) or 3 (moderate OA). Additionally, the need to re-estimate the required sample size will be evaluated using the information available at interim. At the interim analysis, contingent on observed response rates and corresponding statistical signal, the required sample size may increase, ranging from 100 to 288 patients in total for each of the two studies.

Enrollment: 148 estimated patients

Sex: All

Ages: 30+ years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Male or female at least 30 years of age at the time of screening
• Willingness and ability to comply with study procedures and visit schedules and able to follow oral and written instructions
• Signed consent for study participation
• Baseline NPRS ≥ 4 points
• Presence of chronic, symptomatic knee pain in at least one knee; if both knees are affected, the knee with greater severity will be selected for treatment
• KL grade 2 or 3 knee OA based on standing knee X-ray assessment
• Body mass index ≤ 30 kg/m2

Exclusion criteria

• Approved anti-inflammatory therapy injections (corticosteroid, Synvisc, PRP, nSTRIDE-Autologous Protein Solution) within the previous 6 months in the knee
• Major axial deviation (varus >10°, valgus >10°)
• Any concomitant knee lesion causing pain or effusion (i.e., ligamentous or meniscal injury, osteochondral lesion)
• Presence of clinically observed active infection in the index knee
• Diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis, Reiter's syndrome, psoriatic arthritis, gout, ankylosing spondylitis, or arthritis secondary to other inflammatory diseases; chondrocalcinosis, Paget's disease, or villonodular synovitis
• Diagnosed with leukemia or other hematologic cancers, known presence of metastatic malignant cells, or ongoing or planned chemotherapeutic treatment
• Presence of venous or lymphatic stasis in the index leg
• A history of local anesthetic allergy
• Medical conditions such as hemophilia or other blood clotting disorders
• Arthroscopic knee surgery within the previous 6 months
• Daily opioid use for the past 3 months, use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs within 1 week of the procedure, unable to hold anti-platelet medications
• Use of systemic corticosteroids for treatment of a chronic medical condition within the past 3 months
• Immunosuppression or acute infective processes

Study Treatment Exclusion:

• For Study 1: Inability to tolerate the bone marrow aspiration procedure resulting in insufficient collection of BMA (<10 mL) after two successive aspiration attempts
• For Study 2: Inability to tolerate the lipoaspiration procedure resulting in insufficient collection of LA (<40 mL) after two successive aspiration attempts

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: Quadruple Blind

---

148 participants in 4 patient groups, including a placebo group

For STUDY 1 (ARM A): Bone Marrow Aspirate (BMA)

Experimental group

Description:

This group will undergo a bone marrow aspiration and receive an ultrasound guided intra-articular injection of BMA (a single dose of cellular suspension of 9 mL or less)

Treatment:

Biological: Bone Marrow Aspirate (BMA): Minimally manipulated autologous cellular preparation

For STUDY 1 (ARM C): Saline Injection

Placebo Comparator group

Description:

This group will undergo a bone marrow aspiration and receive an ultrasound guided intra-articular injection of saline solution (9 mL)

Treatment:

Other: Saline (Placebo Comparator for BMA)

For STUDY 2 (ARM B): Lipoaspirate Micronized + Leukocyte-Poor Platelet-Rich Plasma (LAM + LP-PRP)

Experimental group

Description:

This group will undergo a blood collection plus lipoaspiration and receive an ultrasound guided intra-articular injection of LAM (a single dose of cellular suspension of 9 mL or less) followed by LP-PRP (a single dose of cellular suspension of 2 mL or less)

Treatment:

Biological: Lipoaspirate Micronized + Leukocyte-Poor Platelet-Rich Plasma (LAM + LP-PRP): Minimally manipulated autologous cellular preparations

For STUDY 2 (ARM D): Saline Injection

Placebo Comparator group

Description:

This group will undergo a blood collection plus lipoaspiration and receive ultrasound guided intra-articular injections of saline solution (9 mL followed by 2 mL)

Treatment:

Other: Saline (Placebo Comparator for LAM + LP-PRP)