ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Autologous Platelet-rich Plasma to Improve Responsiveness and Embryo Quality in Patients With Poor Ovarian Response

N

Nanjing University

Status and phase

Unknown
Phase 2

Conditions

Infertility

Treatments

Biological: PRP

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT05105724
SZ-2019-PRP

Details and patient eligibility

About

This study was a prospective randomized controlled trial. Patients with POR who were aged <40 years and underwent IVF/ICSI with assisted ovulation induction at our hospital were enrolled in the study. After randomization using Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Albuquerque, NM, USA), these patients were divided into two groups. Group A was the experimental group, wherein ovarian injections of PRP were administered to the patients, and group B was the control group, wherein no ovarian puncture or injection was used in the patients.

Full description

Poor ovarian response (POR) is a pathological state, wherein the ovaries are insensitive to exogenous gonadotropin (Gn) stimulation; it is often noted older populations with ovarian hypofunction. POR mainly manifests as the development of only few follicles during ovarian stimulation cycles, low peak levels of blood estrogen on human chorionic Gn (HCG) trigger day, high dosage of exogenous Gn, high rates of cycle cancellation, low number of oocytes retrieved, and low rates of clinical pregnancy. The incidence of POR during ovulation induction in assisted reproduction is reported to be approximately 9%-24%. With the increasing age of individuals at marriage and childbearing as well as the reform of the national family planning policy, an increasing number of women of advanced maternal age have resorted to assisted reproductive technology for fertility, resulting in an increased proportion of patients with POR in China. Repeated in-vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles and adverse pregnancy outcomes of patients with POR have undoubtedly resulted in great financial burden and psychological pressure on infertile couples. Therefore, the individualized selection of an appropriate ovulation induction protocol has become a key factor in terms of improving ovarian responsiveness, which can in turn improve ovarian sensitivity to ovulation drugs and increase oocyte quantity and quality when the patient is supplemented with pre-treatment prior to ovulation induction.

The intraperitoneal injection of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) into the ovaries of mice of the cyclophosphamide-induced premature ovarian failure model resulted in an increase in ovarian cortical volume, preantral follicle number, and antral follicle and their corresponding oocyte diameters. This finding suggests that PRP has a positive effect on the tissue repair of damaged ovaries and that it stimulates the growth of various follicles after ovarian damage in animals, is involved in oogenesis, induces an increase in the number of follicles and granulosa cells, and stimulates estrogen secretion. The addition of PRP to in-vitro three-dimensional cultures of follicles increases the viability and growth of human primordial and preantral follicles and produced more beneficial growth factors. The Pantos team pioneered the administration of intra-ovarian injections of PRP to four infertile patients of advanced maternal age with ovarian hypofunction. These patients' ovarian reserves improved, as evidenced by their elevated serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels, decreased follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels, and/or increased total antral follicular counts. Then, the patients received IVF treatment, each patient receiving at least one blastocyst for cryopreservation. A recent clinical study used PRP in 19 patients with POR. Two of these patients had spontaneous pregnancies and one had a successful clinical pregnancy. Taken together, this evidence suggests the promising use of PRP in ovarian tissue and the potential of PRP as a novel effective treatment option for patients with POR.

In light of the current situation of POR treatment, the investigators proposed a clinical research project of ovarian injection of autologous PRP for the treatment of POR. The PRP used clinically has been evaluated in well-developed preclinical safety studies and necessary quality control without any ethical controversy. Moreover, PRP does not pose a medical risk and has high safety levels in the treatment of diseases. The goal of our project was to aid in the development of new methods of POR treatment that can meet the urgent fertility needs of patients.

Enrollment

50 estimated patients

Sex

Female

Ages

20 to 40 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age ≥20 years and <40 years;
  2. Underwent at least one IVF/ICSI ovulation induction cycle at our center and with a number of retrieved oocytes of ≤3;
  3. Total antral follicular count of <5-7 or AMH levels of <0.5-1.1 μg/L.

Exclusion criteria

  1. Chromosomal abnormalities in either parent;
  2. Acute infectious diseases, endocrine metabolic diseases, and other such conditions;
  3. Underwent surgery for borderline ovarian cancer or malignant tumors;
  4. Abnormal uterine development, uterine adhesions, or other untreated endometrial lesions;
  5. Factors affecting oocyte retrieval or ovarian injections, such as ovarian cysts of ≥3 cm, ovarian endometriosis cysts, severe pelvic adhesions, and poor visualization of ovarian positions;
  6. Conditions affecting the pregnancy outcome, such as untreated hydrosalpinx, hysteromyoma of ≥4 cm, adenomyosis, and stage III-IV endometriosis;
  7. Azoospermia or severe oligospermia and teratozoospermia in the male partner;
  8. Participated in another investigational trial within the previous year;
  9. Allergies to blood products.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Quadruple Blind

50 participants in 2 patient groups

PRP
Experimental group
Description:
ovarian injections of PRP were administered to the patients
Treatment:
Biological: PRP
No ovarian puncture or injection
No Intervention group
Description:
no ovarian puncture or injection was used in the patients

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Yue Jiang, PhD

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems