ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Automatic Reaction to Physical Activity and Sedentary Stimuli in Aging

University of Ottawa logo

University of Ottawa

Status

Not yet enrolling

Conditions

Aging

Treatments

Behavioral: Adjusted Cognitive-biased modification task
Behavioral: Cognitive-biased modification task

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT05704660
H-09-22-8453

Details and patient eligibility

About

Most individuals are aware of the benefits to health of regular physical activity and have good intentions to exercise. Yet, 1.4 billion people worldwide are inactive, which suggests that turning intention into action can be challenging. Recent findings show that the intention-action gap could be explained by negative automatic reactions (which is a component of dual-task theory) to stimuli associated with physical activity. This gap is particularly concerning in older adults, who are more likely to spontaneously associate physical activity with fear, pain, or discomfort. To promote physical activity, the current project proposes to train older adults to suppress their automatic attraction toward sedentary stimuli and to respond positively to physical-activity stimuli. This evidence-based and low-cost intervention aims to improve physical functioning and quality of life for these population. The results will inform public-health policies and improve clinical interventions that aim to counteract a global health problem: the pandemic of physical inactivity.

Full description

Physical activity is one of the top contributors to health, reducing rates of cardiovascular disease, cancer, hypertension, diabetes, obesity, and depression. This wide spectrum of benefits is particularly important for older adults, who often suffer structural and functional deterioration in several physiological systems. Physical activity can reduce and delay the impact of this age-related deterioration in health and functional independence. Current interventions to enhance physical activity in older adults rely mainly on reflective processes by providing rational information about the health benefits of a physically active lifestyle. While these interventions successfully increase intention, their effect on actual behavior is weak. That is, most individuals are now aware of the positive effects of regular physical activity and have the intention to exercise. However, this intention is not sufficient and exercise plans are often not executed. This gap between intention and action is a challenge that health professionals need to address to counteract the pandemic of physical inactivity. Recent findings suggest that this inability to turn the intention into action is explained by negative automatic reactions to stimuli associated with physical activity. These automatic reactions could be particularly strong in older adults, who are more likely to associate physical activity with fear, pain, or discomfort. This study aims to test the effect of an intervention that targets the automatic processes underlying physical inactivity in older adults. The intervention is expected to reduce physical inactivity during the intervention and at follow-up, thereby improving physical functioning and quality of life.

Enrollment

216 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

60+ years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • 60 years of age or older and able to understand instructions in English.

Exclusion criteria

  • Diagnosed psychiatric disorders or neurological condition (e.g., stork, Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, dementia)
  • Unable to carry out the training program
  • Unable to understand the protocol
  • Motor deficit preventing physical activity without external help
  • Physical health status preventing physical activity
  • Alcohol or substance dependence.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Other

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Double Blind

216 participants in 2 patient groups, including a placebo group

Adjusted and modified Cognitive-Biased Modification Task
Experimental group
Description:
The intervention is based on a Go/No-Go task.
Treatment:
Behavioral: Adjusted Cognitive-biased modification task
Normal Cognitve-Biased modification Task
Placebo Comparator group
Description:
The Sham-intervention is based on a Go/No-Go task.
Treatment:
Behavioral: Cognitive-biased modification task

Trial documents
1

Trial contacts and locations

0

Loading...

Central trial contact

Matthieu P. Boisgontier, PhD; Ataallah Farajzadeh, MSc

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems