Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Data from cohorts, prospective studies and one randomized trial (ASCOG Z0011) support the hypothesis that omission of additional axillary dissection in case of positive sentinel node has a limited impact on overall survival and relapse free survival. However, these data are not sufficient enough to recommend, as a standard of care, to avoid axillary dissection in case of positive sentinel node. The ASCOG Z0011 trial has been closed before the end of inclusions and the predefined non inferiority margin was found to be too large (5% difference at 5 years for primary endpoint).
Prospective randomized trial is then urgently mandatory before omission of axillary node dissection becomes a usual practice without a sufficient scientific level of proof. Indeed, in several reviews, the rate of omission of axillary node dissection in case of micrometastasis increased (Bilimoria) despite any strong proof has been demonstrated.
The omission of axillary node dissection in case of positive sentinel node may have strong practical impacts on patients but also on medical and economical aspects: in avoiding a prolonged hospitalisation, secondary morbidities due to axillary dissection requiring secondary care and their costs, as well as costs for secondary axillary dissection (14 to 25% in case of positive sentinel node) and finally shortening surgery duration.
The main investigator propose a Non Inferiority Randomized Multicenter Phase III Trial of Axillary Node Dissection Versus no Axillary Node Dissection in Case of Positive Sentinel Lymph Node in Invasive Breast Cancer
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
6- Patients for whom conservative surgery with sentinel lymph node (SLN) technique is feasible from the start in terms of carcinologic,
7 -All patients with lymph node involvement (GS+), whatever the size of the metastasis (macro-metastasis, micro-metastasis, cellular cluster or isolated tumor cells),
8 - Patient affiliated to a social security system or benefiting from such a system,
9 - Signed consent to participate.
Exclusion criteria
10- Patient deprived of liberty or under supervision of a guardian
11- Impossibility to undergo medical examinations of the study for geographical, social or psychological reasons.
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
2,228 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Dominique GENRE, MD; Sandra COURNIER
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal