ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

AZA+Lus VS AZA Monotherapy in HR-MDS

Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College logo

Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College

Status and phase

Not yet enrolling
Phase 3

Conditions

Higher-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Treatments

Drug: Azacitidine (AZA)
Drug: Luspatercept

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06927232
AZA-Lus-HRMDS

Details and patient eligibility

About

This study is a randomized, prospective, single-center, open-label cohort study involving untreated HR-MDS patients. The patients were divided randomized into AZA+Lus cohort and AZA monotherapy cohort.

Full description

The hypomethylating agents (HMA) azacitidine (AZA) and decitabine (DEC) have been shown to improve survival and delay disease progression in patients with high-risk MDS. They are recommended by the NCCN as first-line treatments for patients with high-risk MDS. Clinical trials have demonstrated an OR rate of approximately 40-50% with AZA in patients with high-risk MDS. Despite the efficacy of HMA therapy, the rate of transfusion independence remains low. Anemia remains the most prominent symptom in refractory patients, with very limited options for subsequent treatment. Prolonged anemia affects every organ function and seriously affects the prognosis of patients.

Luspatercept is currently approved for the treatment of patients with both erythropoiesis receptor agonist ( ESA) treatment failures in transfusion-dependent low-risk MDS-RS patients. In a randomized controlled phase III clinical trial, compared to a placebo group, luspatercept significantly improved transfusion dependence and improved hemoglobin and quality of life in refractory MDS-RS patients. A recent conference report suggested that there was no significant difference in efficacy between low-risk and high-risk patients treated with luspatercept and that the HI rate for high-risk patients treated with luspatercept monotherapy was approximately 50%.

Thus this study aimed to compare the efficacy of AZA+luspatercept and AZA monotherapy.

Enrollment

86 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥18 years old
  • Diagnosed as higher-risk MDS (IPSS intermediate-2/high-risk, or IPSS-R >3.5, or IPSS-M moderate high-, high-, very high-risk)
  • Untreated patients
  • Liver and kidney function less than 2 times of upper limit of normal
  • ECOG≤2 and expected survival more than 6 months
  • Informed consent signed

Exclusion criteria

  • With active infection
  • Other malignant tumors
  • Obvious abnormal liver and kidney function, or abnormal function of other organs
  • Combined with myelofibrosis
  • Have undergone bone marrow transplantation
  • Pregnant or lactating women, or men who have recent reproductive needs
  • Allergic to azacytidine, Rotercept or excipients
  • History of polysorbate 80 allergy
  • Refuse to sign informed consent
  • Researchers consider it inappropriate to participate in the experiment

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

86 participants in 2 patient groups

Azacitidine+Luspatercept
Experimental group
Treatment:
Drug: Luspatercept
Drug: Azacitidine (AZA)
Azacitidine
Active Comparator group
Treatment:
Drug: Azacitidine (AZA)

Trial contacts and locations

0

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems