Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
About
Chlamydia trachomatis is the most commonly reported bacterial sexually transmitted infection (STI), especially among young women. Up to 75% of C. trachomatis infected women are asymptomatic. If untreated, C. trachomatis infection can cause sequelae such as pelvic inflammatory disease, ectopic pregnancy and tubal factor infertility. C. trachomatis can also cause anorectal infections, which are typically asymptomatic. Among women with urogenital chlamydial infection, around 36-91% also had concurrent anorectal chlamydial. Notably, there was no association with anal intercourse in the studies that reported it. However, guidelines do not recommend routine anorectal testing, but restricted testing in people who are in high-risk groups, report anal sexual behavior, or have anal symptoms, i.e., on selective indications. This is in contrast to urogenital testing, which is a routine procedure in STI care services.
The anal transmission of C. trachomatis in women may occur by autoinoculation from the vagina due to the close proximity of the vagina and the anus. C. trachomatis could lead to a persistent infection in the lower gastrointestinal tract, suggesting the potential role of autoinoculation of cervical chlamydial infection from the rectal site. Such (repeat) urogenital infections could lead to reproductive tract morbidity. Recommended treatments for C. trachomatis infections are a single 1g dose of azithromycin or 100mg of doxycycline 2 times a day for 7 days. Although these two regimens are equivalent for urogenital infection, no study has compared the effectiveness of these two treatments on anorectal infection. If rectal C. trachomatis is a hidden reservoir influencing transmission rates, and considering the potential complications of cervical infections, providing further evidence of the need for effective rectal treatments among women is highly relevant.
Full description
A possible reason for C. trachomatis detection after treatment may be transmission (self or another) or treatment failure. Whether antimicrobial treatment failure for C. trachomatis plays a role remains poorly understood. There is no evidence of antimicrobial resistance and testing for antimicrobial resistance for C. trachomatis is not routinely available. The hypothesis of transmission is most likely, especially as recontamination is very common among young people, either due to an untreated partner or a new partner. When these two conditions are ruled out, the hypothesis of autoinoculation from rectum to vagina is quite probable.
With regard to anorectal C. trachomatis infections, some studies concluded that azithromycin is a suboptimal treatment], while another study found doxycycline and azithromycin treatment to be equally effective. However, there are no robust studies that shows conclusive evidence relating to a suboptimal effect of any time of treatment or that prefers one treatment over the other.
The current study attempts to clarify the above question. The team propose to conduct the first open-label randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy (measured as microbial cure) of a single 1g dose of azithromycin versus 100 mg of doxycycline twice daily for seven days for the treatment of anorectal C. trachomatis infection concurrent to urogenital infection in women. The experimental group will include women with C. trachomatis-positive vaginal and anorectal swabs treated with doxycycline twice daily for seven days with one tablet of 100 mg of doxycycline in the morning and evening. The control group will include women with C. trachomatis-positive vaginal and anorectal swabs treated with azithromycin consisting of four tablets of 250 mg of azithromycin in one intake.
The team made the hypothesis that the efficacy of azithromycin for anorectal infections may be lower than that of doxycycline, resulting in reinfections by autoinoculation from rectum to vagina. The expected result is that the number of women with a C. trachomatis-positive NAAT result in the anorectal swab will be significantly higher in the control group than in the experimental group after treatment.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
460 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Bertille de Barbeyrac, MD; Olivia Peuchant, MD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal