ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Baerveldt (BGI) Valve Versus Ahmed(AGV) Valve in Management of Difficult Glaucoma Cases

A

Ain Shams University

Status

Completed

Conditions

Glaucoma, Neovascular
Glaucoma Secondary
Glaucoma, Open-Angle
Glaucoma, Angle-Closure

Treatments

Device: glaucoma implant procedure (Ahmed)
Device: glaucoma implant procedure (Baerveldt)

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT04215575
FWA000017585 FMASU21/2017

Details and patient eligibility

About

Refractory glaucoma is a difficult subject as many glaucoma devices attempt to reduce IOP. Baerveldt implant is considered as a large implant, and, on the contrary, Ahmed implant is considered a small implant as many comparisons have showed. Investigators have previously used two models S2 and FP7 Ahmed implant. Currently, investigators use Baerveldt implant in refractory glaucoma cases in order to compare it with the Ahmed implant.

Full description

Eighty-one participants with glaucoma after ocular surgery or secondary glaucoma with persistent and uncontrolled IOP > 21 mmHg were randomized for placement of Baerveldt implant or Ahmed implant models using a standardized surgical technique.

The primary outcome was failure, which was defined as IOP >16 mmHg with glaucoma medication on 2 consecutive study visits. Secondary outcomes were IOP, medication use, visual acuity, complications, and interventions.

Enrollment

81 patients

Sex

All

Ages

40 to 65 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

1 - patients with glaucoma who underwent a previous failed trabeculectomy or other intraocular surgery.

2- patients who had secondary glaucoma and are known to have a high failure rate with trabeculectomy such as neovascular, uveitis, or iridocorneal endothelial syndrome-associated glaucoma, were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria

1 - patients lacked light perception, unwilling or unable to give informed consent, were expected to be unavailable for follow-up visits.

2-had previous aqueous shunt implanted in the same eye, other external impediment to supero-temporal drainage device implantation.

3- presence of silicone oil, vitreous in the anterior chamber sufficient to require a vitrectomy.

4-uveitis associated with a systemic condition like juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, nanophthalmos, Sturge-Weber syndrome or other conditions associated with elevated episcleral venous pressure.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Double Blind

81 participants in 2 patient groups

BGI model 101-350 placement (BGI group)
Active Comparator group
Description:
A 350 mm2 Baerveldt glaucoma implant was placed. Follow-up visits were scheduled 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year postoperatively. The primary outcome measure was failure that defined as IOP \>16 mmHg or less than a 20% reduction below baseline on 2 consecutive study visits.The IOP, the use of glaucoma medications, visual acuity (VA), visual fields, bleb morphology and rates of surgical complications were secondary outcome measures.
Treatment:
Device: glaucoma implant procedure (Baerveldt)
AGV model FP7 or S2 placement (AGV group)
Experimental group
Description:
A 184 mm2 Ahmed glaucoma implant was placed. Follow-up visits were scheduled 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year postoperatively. The primary outcome measure was failure that defined as IOP \>16 mmHg or less than a 20% reduction below baseline on 2 consecutive study visits. The IOP, the use of glaucoma medications, visual acuity (VA), visual fields, bleb morphology and rates of surgical complications were secondary outcome measures
Treatment:
Device: glaucoma implant procedure (Ahmed)

Trial contacts and locations

0

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems