Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The addition of an Extracorporeal-Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (ECPR) service to a region may improve the survival of young patients with sudden unexpected cardiac arrest.The primary aim of this study is to determine the benefit of the systematic integration of ECPR services into the out-of-hospital cardiac arrest management algorithm. The investigators will compare the outcomes of ECPR-eligible patients in the intervention region, in comparison to patients meeting the same criteria in a comparable setting.
Full description
British Columbia is a province which contains four metropolitan areas, each of which contains at least one tertiary care centre that provides Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) and cardiovascular surgery services, in addition to critical cardiology services and a coronary catheterization laboratory. Pre-hospital medical care in all areas is provided by British Columbia Emergency Health Services (BCEHS), which uses a tiered system of basic life support and advanced life support (ALS) paramedics (90% of cases have ALS involvement) in coordination with fire department first responders. Medical providers in the study footprint have extensive experience with interventional trials enrolling patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, through participation in the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium.
Through collaboration of clinicians from all areas and with BCEHS, this study will examine the benefit of a regional ECPR protocol established in one of the metropolitan areas (the "ECPR Protocol Region"), in comparison to the other areas (the "Usual Care Region"). The primary aim is to determine the benefit of incorporating ECPR services into a regional medical system of care for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. All patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest treated by emergency medical services (EMS) in both regions will be prospectively evaluated for study eligibility.
Secondary aims include:
This study is a parallel group design with group allocation based on region of treatment. The investigators will compare the outcomes of ECPR-eligible patients in the intervention region, in comparison to patients meeting the same criteria in a comparable setting (the control regions group). Medical care in the control regions will be unaltered by this study.
Group outcomes will be compared. The association of treatment group and outcomes will also be assessed using a logistic regression analysis, while adjusting for other important prognosticators in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (including initial cardiac rhythm, time to emergency medical services [EMS] arrival, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation [CPR], EMS-witnessed arrest, and age).
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
The study evaluates the outcomes of those treated with an ECPR protocol, in comparison to patients in the control region meeting the same criteria. The following is the regional ECPR eligibility criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:
Intra-arrest treatment by an ALS paramedic
Age ≥ 18 and ≤ 65 years
Witnessed arrest
Bystander CPR required if initial rhythm is pulseless electrical activity (added to the protocol June, 2018 and applied retrospectively)
Cause of the arrest is presumed to be one of the following:
(5) The patient remains pulseless after a minimum of 3 cycles of CPR (by any professional provider).
Exclusion Criteria:
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
308 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal