Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
This study was a comparative, single-center, non-randomized study conducted to evaluate the SpO2 accuracy per standards and guidelines identified above for SpO2 accuracy for pulse oximetry equipment over the range of 70-100% SaO2 under non-motion conditions. Arterial blood sampling measured by functional SaO2 CO-Oximetry, was used as the basis for comparison. Testing was conducted under normal office environment conditions.
Full description
Pulse oximetry monitoring is considered a standard physiological measurement and is used by clinicians in everyday situations to estimate arterial oxygen saturation. A pulse oximeter is a device that measures the oxygen saturation of arterial blood non-invasively. In general, pulse oximeters use two wavelength absorption spectrophotometry to measure oxygen saturation based on the amount of reflected or scattered radiation. The wavelengths are selected to provide the best separation of absorbencies of oxy-hemoglobin (O2Hb) and deoxy-hemoglobin (HHb) states. The ratio of the two absorbencies is used to calculate the oxygen saturation (SpO2) value. Because an arterial sample of blood is not required to make the measurement, the pulse oximeter can provide non-invasive real time information. The clinical use of pulse oximeters has reduced the frequency and necessity of invasive arterial blood sampling, and has helped to improve patient safety by providing information to clinicians about patients' oxygenation status.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the SpO2 accuracy performance of the Belun Ring Oximeter placed on the index fingers during non-motion conditions over the range of 70-100% SaO2 to arterial blood samples assessed by CO-Oximetry for an SpO2 validation.
The primary goal, was to show the SpO2 accuracy performance for the investigational device below. As a secondary goal, the pulse rate accuracy performance for the Belun ring was calculated.
It was expected that the Accuracy Root Mean Square (ARMS) performance would meet the required specification of ARMS 3.5% or lower in non-motion conditions for the range of 70 - 100% SaO2 thereby demonstrating an acceptable SpO2 accuracy performance specification. For the pulse rate accuracy, the desired goal was to have an accuracy performance of an ARMS of 3.
No risks or adverse device effects were expected. There were no contraindications for use in the proposed study / study population.
The study was conducted in accordance to the code of federal regulations for non-significant medical device studies and applicable ISO 14155 (2nd edition 2011-02-01), applicable sections of ISO 80601-2-61, second edition 2017-12, Corrected version 2018-02, and Pulse Oximeters - Premarket Notifications Submissions [510(k)s] Guidance For Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff (issued: March 4, 2013).
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Subject is considered as being morbidly obese (defined as BMI >39.5)
Compromised circulation, injury, or physical malformation of fingers, wrist, hands, ears or forehead/skull or other sensor sites which would limit the ability to test sites needed for the study. (Note: Certain malformations may still allow subjects to participate if the condition is noted and would not affect the particular sites utilized.)
Female subjects that are actively trying to get pregnant or are pregnant (confirmed by positive urine pregnancy test unless the subject is known to be not of child-bearing potential).
Smoker Subjects who have refrained will be screened for COHb levels >3% as assessed with a Masimo Radical 7 (Rainbow)
Subjects with known respiratory conditions such as: (self-reported)
Subjects with known heart or cardiovascular conditions such as: (self-reported, except for blood pressure and ECG review)
Self-reported health conditions as identified in the Health Assessment Form (self-reported)
Subjects with known clotting disorders (self-reported)
Subjects with severe contact allergies to standard adhesives, latex or other materials found in pulse oximetry sensors, ECG electrodes, respiration monitor electrodes or other medical sensors (self-reported)
Subjects with severe allergies to iodine (only applicable if iodine is used)
Subjects with severe allergies to lidocaine (or similar pharmacological agents, e.g. Novocain)
Failure of the Perfusion Index Ulnar/Ulnar+Radial Ratio test (Ratio < 0.4)
Unwillingness or inability to remove colored nail polish from test digits.
Other known health condition, should be considered upon disclosure in health assessment form
10 participants in 1 patient group
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal