ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Benefit of the Digital Workflow for Screw-retained Single Implant Restorations

U

University of Liege

Status and phase

Completed
Phase 4

Conditions

Tooth Loss

Treatments

Device: Crown manufacturing procedures
Device: Impression procedure

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT03234868
H2015-4

Details and patient eligibility

About

The aim of this research project is emphasize the benefit of the digital workflow compared to conventional impressions and crown processing with standard la procedures. The objectives of the present study are to measure and compare the global cost, the time spent in the dental chair and in the lab and the fit of both digital and conventional workflow. Additionally, patient centered outcomes will be recorded.

Enrollment

34 patients

Sex

All

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Subject must have voluntarily signed the informed consent form before any study related action
  • Age: 18 with one or more missing teeth in the maxillary area, seeking for implant therapy.
  • Men/Women
  • In good systemic health (ASA I/ II)
  • Present with no contra indication against oral surgical interventions
  • Patients required replacement of a single missing tooth. The tooth at the implant site(s) must have been extracted or lost at least 12 weeks before the date of implantation.
  • At least 10 mm of bone in the vertical dimension
  • At least 6 mm of bone in the bucco-lingual dimension.
  • No need for bone augmentation procedure in any of the dimensions
  • Full mouth plaque score (FMPI) lower or equal than 25%

Exclusion criteria

  • Autoimmune disease require medical treatment
  • Medical conditions requiring prolonged use of steroids
  • Use of Bisphosphonate intravenously or more then
  • Infection (local or systemic) - patient with gingivitis or active local infection will undergo a medical treatment prior to his entrance to the study, each individual will be evaluated prior to study procedure for suitability, in case of systemic infection the evaluation will be based on medical anamneses, and if necessary will be referred to relevant medical tests.
  • Current pregnancy or breastfeeding women
  • Alcoholism or chronically drug abuse
  • Immunocompromised patients
  • Uncontrolled Diabetes
  • Smokers
  • Prisoners

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

34 participants in 4 patient groups

Optical impression
Experimental group
Description:
The optical impression system used for the study is TRIOS (3 shape). First of all, the operators in charge of taking the digital impressions are going to get trained prior the study and will calibrate (learning curve). MIS Scan bodies will be placed on the multi-unit plaforms, an x-ray will be taken in order to check the fit) and the impression will be realised following the instruction given by the system (first the maxillary and mandibular impressions followed by the bite registration). Shade will be chosen using VITA toothguide 3D master (to pick the right zirconia shade).
Treatment:
Device: Impression procedure
Conventional impression
Active Comparator group
Description:
Once the impression coping is placed on the multi-unit plaform, the fit will be checked with an intra-oral X-ray. The impressions will be made with medium viscosity silicon. As a second step, alginate antagonist impression will be done. Bite will not be recorded (single tooth missing). The two impressions will be placed in a hermetic plastic bag and send to lab. Shade will be chosen using VITA toothguide 3D master.
Treatment:
Device: Impression procedure
Digital workflow
Experimental group
Description:
The implant crowns issued from digital impressions will be done according a cast less / full digital workflow. The STL files collected from the TRIOS will be sent directly to the lab. The designing of the full zirconia crowns will be performed in the TRIOS 3SHAPE program. The resulting files will be sent to the CAM unit production (Amman Girrbach milling machine \& MAZAK CNC machine: Mcenter to be specify (Berlin or Israel) to be milled (milled \& sintered only) considering the direct adaption for a Multi-Unit connection. A superficial make-up will be done on the monolithic crown in the lab. And finally, the products will be delivered to the dentist.
Treatment:
Device: Crown manufacturing procedures
Conventional workflow
Active Comparator group
Description:
The implant crowns issued from conventional impressions will be realised by sending the impressions to the lab (Mirko Picone). The lab will pour the impressions in dental stone (class 4 scannable without powdering: extra hard and scanning powder included). Then, the technician will realize a mock-up of the crown's framework on a temporary abutment in DuraLay Resin. The mock up will be scanned with ZIRKONZAHN scanner (or equivalent) and send this information to a central fabrication facility for milling (Amman Girrbach milling machine \& MAZAK CNC machine: Mcenter: to be specify (Berlin or Israel). The lab technician will get the Zi framework back and will apply veneer ceramic.
Treatment:
Device: Crown manufacturing procedures

Trial contacts and locations

0

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems