Benefits of Lightweight Ambulatory Oxygen Systems for Individuals With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

University of Minnesota (UMN)

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

Treatments

Device: E-Cylinder

Device: Lightweight Cylinder

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

NETWORK

NIH

Identifiers

NCT00325754

0405S60010

U10HL074424 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Details and patient eligibility

About

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) affects over 14 million people in the United States. It is the fourth leading cause of death and the only leading cause of death for which mortality rates are rising. Medical science has developed few effective therapies for COPD. In patients with advanced COPD and chronic hypoxemia, long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) has been shown to be uniquely beneficial. It is the only available non-surgical therapy demonstrated to prolong survival in these patients. This study will compare the clinical and physiologic benefits of two different oxygen therapy devices among hypoxemic individuals with COPD: a lightweight ambulatory oxygen device versus the standard portable E-cylinder device.

Full description

Individuals with COPD who experience hypoxemia (reduction of oxygen concentration in arterial blood) have an especially poor prognosis. Provision of LTOT to hypoxemic COPD patients is considered to be the standard of care. The majority of hypoxemic patients that are ambulatory are supplied with pressurized oxygen in E-cylinders. This system weighs approximately 22 pounds, is mounted on a wheeled cart, and is towed by the patient. These cumbersome systems can be seen to impose a significant burden on weak and debilitated patients, discouraging them from being active. E-cylinders towed on a cart are referred to as 'portable', in contrast to lightweight 'ambulatory' oxygen systems, which weigh less than 10 pounds and are designed to be carried by the patient. It is unknown whether patients provided with lightweight ambulatory systems comply better with oxygen prescription and increase their daily level of activity. This study will compare the use and benefits of a lightweight ambulatory oxygen device versus the standard portable E-cylinder device among hypoxemic individuals with COPD. Specifically, the study will examine daily duration of oxygen therapy and activity levels amongst both groups.

Enrollment

22 patients

Sex

All

Ages

40+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

Currently in a stable phase of COPD, defined as having had no disease exacerbation within the 4 weeks prior to study entry
Ambulatory
Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) less than or equal to 60% of predicted value at screening
Ratio of FEV1 and forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) less than or equal to 65% of predicted value at screening
Currently receiving long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT)
Partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (PaO2) less than 60 torr

Exclusion criteria

Clinically significant cardiovascular disease (e.g., uncontrolled hypertension, left-sided heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, exertional angina, complex arrhythmias, severe dependent edema, ischemic changes on stress electrocardiogram that would be contraindications for unrestricted ambulation or the 6-minute walk test)
Orthopedic impairments that would limit ambulation
Participation in the active phase of pulmonary rehabilitation within the 3 months prior to study entry
Neurologic impairments (e.g., Parkinson's disease or a stroke) or mental states (e.g., senile dementia) that would limit independent ambulation
Neoplastic disease that is anticipated to influence survival
Currently receiving lightweight ambulatory oxygen therapy
Inability to maintain an oxygen saturation of 92% at rest with 4 liter/minute of continuous oxygen flow and during exercise with an oxygen conserver setting of 6 utilizing a nasal cannula
Currently a smoker
Sleep apnea if it is characterized primarily as central sleep apnea syndrome (whether being treated or not) OR if it is known or suspected obstructive sleep apnea that has existed for at least 2 months and has not received stable treatment (stable treatment modes include positive airway pressure therapies or dental orthotic/mandibular positioning devices); individuals with diagnosed obstructive sleep apnea must have a body mass index less than or equal to 30 kg/m2 to be eligible for this study