Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
This randomized clinical trial is designed to compare three different rehabilitation methods for patients who have undergone anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The study aims to determine whether low-load blood flow restriction training (LL-BFRt) is more effective than high-load eccentric training (HL-Et) and a sham LL-BFRt in improving three key areas: patellar position, muscle morphology, and leg function.
Study Design and Interventions
Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the three intervention groups. All groups will perform eccentric exercises, including single leg squats, single leg deadlifts, lateral step downs, and single leg calf raises. The key differences lie in the load and the use of blood flow restriction:
LL-BFRt Group: Participants will train at 30% of their repetition maximum (RM) while a cuff restricts blood flow to 70% of their artery occlusion pressure (AOP).
HL-Et Group: Participants will train at a higher intensity, using 70% of their repetition maximum (RM), with no blood flow restriction.
Sham LL-BFRt Group: Participants will perform the same exercises as the LL-BFRt group at 30% of their RM, but the cuff will not be inflated to a pressure that restricts blood flow.
After the training period, the researchers will compare the outcomes across all three groups to see which method leads to the most significant improvements in patella position, muscle morphology, and leg function.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
60 participants in 3 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
I Putu Gde Surya Adhitya
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal