Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
About
An open label, randomized, single-dose, two-sequences, two-periods, crossover study to assess the bioequivalence of perampanel in Lepsiramp 0.5mg/ml oral suspension (Test product) in comparison with Fycompa® 0.5mg/ml oral suspension (Reference product) in healthy subjects under fasting conditions.
Full description
This was a single-dose, open-label, randomized, two-sequence, two-period crossover bioequivalence study conducted under fasting conditions at Advanced Research Center (ARC), Cairo, Egypt in 2024. The study compared the bioequivalence of Lepsiramp 0.5 mg/mL oral suspension (Test) with Fycompa® 0.5 mg/mL oral suspension (Reference), both formulations containing perampanel.
Study Design Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive the test or reference product across two study periods, separated by a 6-week washout. Each subject received a single 24 mL oral dose (equivalent to 12 mg perampanel) under fasting conditions. A standardized diet was provided during each period, and fluid intake was controlled pre- and post-dosing to maintain consistency.
Blood Sampling Details In each period, 22 blood samples (5 mL each) were collected to characterize the plasma concentration-time profile. A forearm vein cannula was used for samples up to 24 hours; later samples were collected via venipuncture. Samples were centrifuged at 3500 rpm for 5 minutes at 4°C. Plasma was separated and stored at -80°C pending analysis.
Pharmacokinetic and Bioanalytical Methods Plasma perampanel concentrations were quantified using a validated LC-MS/MS method with a calibration range of 3-400 ng/mL. The primary PK parameters included Cmax and AUC₀-₇₂, while secondary parameters were Tmax, AUC₀-inf, t½, and ke. PK analysis was conducted using Phoenix WinNonlin (v8.3.4), with calculations based on actual sampling times.
Bioequivalence Evaluation Bioequivalence was determined if the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of Cmax and AUC₀-₇₂ fell within the 80-125% range. ANOVA was applied to log-transformed data for Cmax and AUC, and Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for Tmax comparisons.
Safety Evaluation Subjects were monitored for adverse events throughout the study. Vital signs were assessed at multiple time points (pre-dose, and 2, 6, 12, and 72 hours post-dose). Complete blood counts were performed at the study's end.
Statistical Analysis Sample size was calculated using R (v4.2.1), assuming a 19.35% intra-subject variability for Cmax, with 80% power, 5% significance level, and adjustment for expected dropouts. The Two One-Sided Tests (TOST) procedure was applied to log-transformed PK parameters to assess bioequivalence.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Healthy male and female subjects aged between 18 and 55 years.
Non-smokers or mild smokers with a maximum limit of 5 cigarettes/day.
Normal physical examinations at screening visit.
Having BMI ranged between 18.5-30 kg/m2.
Ability to communicate adequately with the clinical staff.
Ability and agreement to comply with the study requirements.
Normal BP and HR measured under stabilized conditions.
Normal laboratory results within normal range or with clinically non-significant deviation including: Complete Blood Count, Clinical Chemistry: Random blood sugar, blood urea, creatinine, sodium, potassium, total bilirubin, alanine amino transferase (ALT/GPT), aspartate amino transferase (AST/GOT), alkaline phosphatase, total protein in serum, Lipid profile, urinalysis.
Negative Virology tests: HIV (HIV Ab), hepatitis B (HBsAg), hepatitis C (HCV IgG).
Negative results for abused drug analysis in urine (Amphetamine (AMP), Barbiturate (BAR), Benzodiazepine (BZO), Cannabinoid (THC), Cocaine, Opiates (Morphine (MOP), Tramadol (TRA)).
Understanding of the study and agreeing to give a written informed consent.
Using an adequate contraception method during the study and for at least 30 days after the study (for potential subjects).
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
26 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal