ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Biofeedback Vs Electrical Stimulation in Treatment of Fecal Incontinence

Cairo University (CU) logo

Cairo University (CU)

Status

Completed

Conditions

Fecal Soiling
Fecal Incontinence
Encopresis

Treatments

Device: Biofeedback
Device: Electrical stimulation
Other: Traditional treatment

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT04380571
Fecal incontinence

Details and patient eligibility

About

Fecal incontinence is one of the most psychological frustrating problems. It occurs in children due to many causes. There is a wide range of non-invasive therapeutic approaches like Kegel exercise, Biofeedback, and posterior tibial nerve stimulation. However, up till now, there are no established guidelines for treatment.

the objective of this study is to evaluate and compare the early effect of Biofeedback therapy versus bilateral transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation (TPNS) as non-invasive methods in the treatment of functional non-retentive fecal incontinence (FNRFI) in children.

Full description

Functional non-retentive fecal incontinence (FNRFI) requires prolonged treatment with a wide range of non-invasive therapeutic approaches like Kegel exercise, Biofeedback, and posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS). However, up till now, there are no established guidelines for treatment.1 The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the early effect of Biofeedback therapy versus bilateral transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation (TPTNS) as non-invasive methods in the treatment of (FNRFI) in children.

Methodology: The current prospective randomized controlled study included 93 children with FNRFI who were randomly divided and allocated into three groups. Group A treated by conventional methods through dietetic regulation and Kegal exercises. Group B treated by biofeedback therapy while group C received bilateral (TPTNS). Initial manometric findings including resting pressure, squeeze pressure, 1st sensation, 1st urge, and intense urge were recorded and repeated after 3 and 6 months together with incontinence score recorded in using St' Mark's (Varizey) with the primary endpoint of improvement of the incontinence score more than 50%.

Enrollment

93 patients

Sex

All

Ages

5 to 15 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • FecaI incontinence
  • Normal defecation frequency,
  • Normal bowel habits and
  • Normal stool consistency

Exclusion criteria

  • Children who are not cooperative,
  • Children with traumatic sphincter injury,
  • Children with fecal impaction,
  • Children with spinal diseases causing incontinence,
  • Children with anorectal malformation,

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Double Blind

93 participants in 3 patient groups

Biofeedback
Experimental group
Description:
Biofeedback therapy in addition to the conventional measures done in the control Group. It was performed in the same position used for baseline manometry. The used protocol included strength and sensory training, twice weekly for 3 months. Strength training was performed by a double-lumen rectal PVC balloon clothed catheter (MMS U-72210).
Treatment:
Device: Biofeedback
Electrical Stimulation
Experimental group
Description:
Bilateral (TPTNS); was applied with an electrode above the medial malleolus A second electrode) was applied just below the same malleolus. Electrical stimulation with a low-frequency current (10 Hz), and adjustable intensity. The procedure was done for 20-30 minutes, three times per week for 3 months together with the conventional maneuvers applied in the control group.
Treatment:
Device: Electrical stimulation
Control group
Active Comparator group
Description:
were managed by conventional methods through Kegal exercises and dietetic regulation where they had received bulky food including vegetables, fruits bran and cereals. Fast foods, spicy drinks and caffeine should be limited in child's diet. Local hygiene and zinc oxide application to the perianal skin were advised to prevent skin excoriation.
Treatment:
Other: Traditional treatment

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems