Biomechanical Effects of Digitally Constructed Subperiosteal Implants

M

Menoufia University

Status

Enrolling

Conditions

Bone Loss

Treatments

Other: Subperiosteal implant framework

Study type

Observational

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06362057
ADMNF-0020324

Details and patient eligibility

About

Subperiosteal implants were first introduced in 1940 and then used worldwide for the treatment of edentulous maxilla or mandible with advanced bone atrophy.

Full description

With the advancement of digital technology for the fabrication of materials and the emerging of new materials, subperiosteal implants can be fabricated from a wide variety of materials, and there is a lack of evidence regarding which material could be suitable.

Enrollment

9 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

30 to 70 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • A 3D image of an edentulous maxilla bone derived from a computed tomography scan of an adult patient.
  • Maxilla with Cawood and Howell class 4 or 5 classification

Exclusion criteria

  • A 2D image of an edentulous maxilla bone
  • A non atrophied maxilla

Trial design

9 participants in 3 patient groups

Titanium framework group
Description:
Virtual design for Titanium subperiosteal framework group on atrophied maxilla.
Treatment:
Other: Subperiosteal implant framework
PEEK framework group
Description:
Virtual design for PEEK subperiosteal framework group on atrophied maxilla.
Treatment:
Other: Subperiosteal implant framework
PEKK framework group
Description:
Virtual design for PEKK subperiosteal framework group on atrophied maxilla.
Treatment:
Other: Subperiosteal implant framework

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Mohammed A. El-Sawy, PhD

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2024 Veeva Systems