Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Aim of this prospective clinical study was to compare two different surgical techniques and used solutions on serum electrolytes, bleeding and Transurethral Resection of Prostate (TURP) syndrome undergoing TURP.
Fifty-three patients scheduled for elective TURP were enrolled in this prospective clinical study. Patients were included one of two groups (Group Monopolar and Group Bipolar).
Full description
Background and Purpose:
Aim of this prospective clinical study was to compare two different surgical techniques and used solutions on serum electrolytes, bleeding and Transurethral Resection of Prostate (TURP) syndrome undergoing TURP.
Methods:
Fifty-three patients scheduled for elective TURP were enrolled in this prospective clinical study. Patients were divided into two groups. Patients in Group M (Monopolar) (n=25) were used monopolar resectoscope (Karl Storz, Tottling, Germany) and 5% mannitol as irrigating solution. Patients in Group B (Bipolar) (n=25) were used bipolar resectoscope TURis (OLYMPUS, Tokyo, Japan) and isotonic saline as irrigating solution. Patients who received spinal anaesthesia were given 2.5-3 ml 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacain intrathecally and others were given general anaesthesia. Patients demographics, prostate volumes, hemodynamic parameters, volumes of irrigation and IV solutions were recorded. Blood samples were collected preoperatively (control), 45 minutes after the induction (2nd Measurement) and 1 hour after the end of the operation for analyzing serum electrolytes, osmolarity, hemoglobin values.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
53 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal