ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Blunt Fascial vs. Veress Needle Peritoneal Entry in Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery (BluntFascial)

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center logo

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

Status

Enrolling

Conditions

Laparoscopic Surgery

Treatments

Procedure: Veress needle abdominal entry
Procedure: Blunt fascial abdominal entry

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06305975
STUDY00003169

Details and patient eligibility

About

This study aims to investigate the effect of two peritoneal entry techniques on intraoperative and post-operative outcomes among patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery with a minimally invasive gynecologic surgeon. Patients will be randomized to either blunt fascial or veress needle peritoneal entry. Insufflation times, failed entries, complications and post-operative pain scores will be collected.

The investigators hypothesize that the blunt entry technique will be associated with shorter insufflation times and similar intraoperative and postoperative outcomes compared with the veress needle entry technique.

Primary Objective: To evaluate the insufflation times and success upon peritoneal entry according to peritoneal entry technique.

Secondary Objectives: To evaluate the surgical outcomes and patients pain scores according to peritoneal entry technique.

Full description

This will be a single-center, single-blinded randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of peritoneal entry technique on insufflation times, entry failure, post-operative pain and surgical outcomes among patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. The investigators hypothesize that the blunt fascial entry technique will be associated with shorter insufflation times with no effect on other surgical outcomes. The study will include 2 groups corresponding to the entry techniques: blunt facial entry and Veress needle entry. Participants will be 1:1 allocated to each technique by block randomization.

Blunt fascial entry technique description: a 5 mm incision is made in the umbilicus. Next, a curved Kelly forceps is used to open the fascia, and, if possible, the peritoneum. The Kelly forceps are then used to expand the opening to a 10 mm diameter. A 5 mm trocar is placed into the fascial hole and used to quickly insufflate the abdomen to 15 mm Hg. Once the abdomen is fully insufflated, a 10 mm trocar is placed using optical guidance.

Enrollment

100 estimated patients

Sex

Female

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  1. Provision of signed and dated informed consent form
  2. Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study
  3. 18 years of age or older
  4. Undergoing conventional laparoscopic surgery at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center with a surgeon in the Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery division.

Exclusion criteria

  1. Pregnancy
  2. Urgent/non-scheduled surgery
  3. Non-eligible for umbilical entry

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

100 participants in 2 patient groups

Blunt fascial entry
Experimental group
Description:
The blunt fascial entry technique will be used for patients in this arm
Treatment:
Procedure: Blunt fascial abdominal entry
Veress needle entry technique
Active Comparator group
Description:
The Veress needle entry technique will be used for patients in this arm
Treatment:
Procedure: Veress needle abdominal entry

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Kacey Hamilton; Raanan Meyer, MD

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems