Status
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
The main goal of our study is to find out why some people with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) do not develop verbal abilities or remain minimally-verbal throughout adolescence and adulthood. Current research focuses on investigating brain differences related to processing sounds and initiating speech in adolescents and young adults with ASD varying in language skills, compared to adolescents who do not have ASD, in order to clarify whether atypical processes of auditory perception, perceptual organization and/or neural oscillation patterns may explain why some individuals with ASD fail to acquire functional speech.
Full description
About 30% of children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) fail to acquire spoken language. This group of children has been seriously neglected in research conducted over the past 2 decades. Little is known about them, in part because the field lacks the tools to assess them, and they often pose significant behavioral challenges that preclude their participation in research studies. Among the ~70% individuals with ASD who have spoken language skills, about 50% are language impaired; the remaining group have normal language scores on standardized tests. Thus, there is enormous heterogeneity in verbal abilities in ASD. To date, studies of the brain and cognitive mechanisms that underlie this heterogeneity remain quite limited.
At the cognitive level, current research suggests that language impairment in verbal children with ASD involves deficits in phonological working memory, as evident on tests of nonsense word repetition. The areas of language that are most affected in this group include complex syntax and morphology related to marking tense (Tager-Flusberg et al., 2005). There is also considerable evidence from MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) studies of both children and adults that there are differences in volume and asymmetry in language regions of the cortex, specifically Broca's and Wernicke's areas. Recent studies suggest that these differences do not necessarily track with degree of language impairment, though there are conflicting findings in the literature. Importantly, most of the participants in cognitive and neuroimaging studies of ASD have been adults and individuals who have relatively intact language. Far less is known about the processes (either cognitive or neural) that might be implicated in the minimally verbal group. This project is designed to address this issue using two different brain imaging methods and approaches.
The investigators plan to collect these data from 3 groups of adolescents with ASD varying in language skills (minimally verbal, verbal-language impaired, verbal-language normal) and age and gender matched non-ASD typical adolescents. The participants will be diagnosed and tested using a range of standardized and non-standardized assessments including IQ/cognitive level; social abilities; ASD severity; communication skills (nonverbal). These assessments will be carried out by trained examiners in the clinical core housed at BU.
Because many of the participants present with highly challenging behaviors and are difficult to test, a number of innovative approaches will be taken to maximize participants' success in completing the behavioral assessments, and then to tolerate and provide artifact-free data in the electrophysiological and MRI portions of the study.
Overall, the investigators hypothesize that the groups tested will differ in their neural indices of auditory perception, neural indices of perceptual organization, and induced neural oscillations. Further, the investigators hypothesize that differences in the degree of language impairment across these groups will be correlated with differences in the degree of abnormality of the measured neural indices, but not in the form of the abnormality, suggesting that the root causes of the differences across the tested subject groups are quantitative rather than qualitative.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
88 participants in 4 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal