ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Brentuximab Vedotin in CutAneous T-cell Lymphomas (CTCL): Post-allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Maintenance (BeCALM)

A

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Status and phase

Not yet enrolling
Phase 3

Conditions

Cutaneous T Cell Lymphoma (CTCL)
Brentuximab Vedotin

Treatments

Drug: Placebo
Drug: Brentuximab Vedotin (Bv)

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT07178457
APHP241010

Details and patient eligibility

About

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) showed efficacy in advanced-stage, high-risk, treatment sensitive cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCL) in a prospective, propensity score-matched controlled study (CUTALLO) published by our group in the Lancet in 2023. Nevertheless, it is associated with a high rate of early relapse, with 2-year progression-free survival around 30%. Brentuximab vedotin (BV) has shown efficacy in the treatment of CD30-expressing CTCL after at least one prior systemic treatment in the ALCANZA trial and is market approved in this indication in Europe and the United States of America. BV has been successfully used as salvage treatment in the post-transplant setting in advanced CTCL. It has been shown that 90% of CTCL express CD30. To reduce the incidence of post-allograft relapse, we propose to assess the routine use of BV post-allograft in adult patients with advanced CD30-expressing mycosis fungoides-CTCL, who have received at least one line of prior systemic therapy, compared to placebo. Switch will be allowed from placebo to BV in case of disease progression. This project is supported by well-organized research networks with a strong track-record of published results in the field: French Study Group on Cutaneous Lymphomas (GFELC, Groupe Français d'Etude des Lymphomes Cutanés), INCa-labelled national rare cancers network; and the French Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and CellTherapy. In the post-transplant setting, the current state-of-the-art practice is to treat patients once they have relapsed post-allogeneic transplant, whereas no prophylactic treatment is given at the time in the absence of characterized disease relapse. This ethically and scientifically justifies the proposal to evaluate whether earlier, prophylactic treatment with BV increases progression-free survival compared to placebo.

Enrollment

84 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 70 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

To be eligible for study entry, patients must meet all of the following criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 and ≤ 70 years

  • Histopathologically confirmed diagnosis of ISCL-EORTC stage IIB, III, IVA or IVB MF (mycosis fungoides) with ≥1% CD30 expression determined by immunohistochemistry

  • ECOG performance status 0-1

  • Relapsed or refractory to at least one line of systemic treatment

  • Complete or partial response of the lymphoma at the time of study inclusion

  • Having received recent alloHSCT from a sibling, 10/10 or 9/10 phenoidentical, or haploidentical donor (60 to 90 days before inclusion)

  • Adequate liver function:

    • Total bilirubin ≤ 2 xULN, or Direct bilirubin ≤ 2xULN if total bilirubin is >2xULN, or total bilirubin >2 xULN if elevated total bilirubin is attributed to Gilbert's syndrome
    • Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≤ 3 x ULN
  • Adequate hematological function:

    • Absolute neutrophil count of ≥ 1.0 G/L
    • Platelet count of ≥ 50 G/L
    • Hemoglobin ≥ 9 g/dL
  • Adequate renal function: creatinine clearance calculated by Cockcroft & Gault formula of ≥ 50 mL/min

  • Patient affiliated to life insurance

  • Written informed consent given by the patient

Exclusion criteria

Any of the following criteria requires the exclusion of the patient before randomization:

  • Second or higher allogeneic HSCT,
  • Other progressive neoplastic or psychotic disease,
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction < 50%, carbone monoxide diffusion capacity < 50% of the theoretical value,
  • History of BV-induced adverse event without resolution to current grade <2. Previous treatment with brentuximab vedotin alone, in the absence of current ≥ grade 2 BV-induced side effect, is NOT an exclusion criterion.
  • History of disease refractoriness, progression or relapse during BV treatment. Previous treatment with BV alone, if the disease was treatment-sensitive (complete, partial response or stable disease), is NOT an exclusion criterion.
  • History of ≥ grade 4 adverse event induced by BV. Previous <grade 4 adverse event induced by BV is not an exclusion criterion if the adverse event has regressed to grade<2.
  • Contra-indication to BV including current >grade 2 neutropenia or active infection,
  • Progressive disease or relapse at study inclusion compared to the screening visit status,
  • Refusal of highly effective birth control method for female participant of childbearing potential and male participant with a female partner of childbearing potential,
  • Pregnant and/or breastfeeding women,
  • Participation to another interventional clinical trial,
  • Adults subject to a legal protection measure (guardianship, curatorship and safeguard of justice),
  • Patients deprived of their liberty by a judicial or administrative decision

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Triple Blind

84 participants in 2 patient groups, including a placebo group

Brentuximab vedotin
Experimental group
Treatment:
Drug: Brentuximab Vedotin (Bv)
Placebo
Placebo Comparator group
Treatment:
Drug: Placebo

Trial contacts and locations

0

Loading...

Central trial contact

Adèle de Masson, MD PhD; Jérôme Lambert, MD PhD

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems