Bulk-fill With Different Technique Three-year Clinical Performance

Mansoura University

Status: Active, not recruiting

Conditions: Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate; Bulk-fill Which is Special Type of Resin Composite

Treatments: Other: Filtek™ Bulk Fill restoration; Other: G-aenial™ BULK Injectable restoration; Other: Heated Filtek™ Bulk Fill restoration; Other: Sonicfill3 restoration

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT05861908

M01060421

Details and patient eligibility

About

The current study will be intended to evaluate and compare three-year clinical performance of class II bulk-fill resin composite restorations placed with different techniques.

Full description

Fifty patients with proximal carious lesion in permanent molars were included in the study. A total eighty class II cavities were restored with one of the following bulk-fill resin composite with their adhesive systems (n=20) Filtek™ Bulk Fill, Heated Filtek™ Bulk Fill, G-aenial™ BULK Injectable or Sonicfill3. Double blinded randomized clinical trial with survival and clinical quality were evaluated at baseline, after 12 , 24 and 36months using modified FDI(Fédération dentaire internationale) World Dental Federation criteria

Enrollment: 50 patients

Sex: All

Ages: 18 to 35 years old

Volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Good general health
• Good oral hygienic
• Patient aging 18-35 year
• Patient available for follow-up visits compound class II (mesio-occlusal or disto-occlusal)
• Carious lesion in the external and middle third of dentin thickness
• ICDAS (International caries detection and assessment system) 4 or 5 that diagnosed clinically and radiographically.
• Maxillary or mandibular first or second molars
• Tooth with antagonist and adjacent mesial and distal tooth contact,
• Normal response to a vitality test.

Exclusion criteria

• Poor oral hygiene
• Severe or chronic periodontitis
• Heavy bruxism
• Occlusion fewer than 20 teeth
• Sensitivity to resin-based material.
• Patients with orthodontic treatment
• Patients on pregnancy or lactation
• chronic use of anti-inflammatory drugs, analgesic, and/or psychotropic drugs
• Patient potentially unable to attend recall visits
• Teeth would need direct pulp capping or
• Teeth act as abutment for fixed or removable prosthesis.

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: Double Blind

---

50 participants in 4 patient groups

Body Bulk-Fill

Experimental group

Description:

20 cavity class II restored with Body bulk-fill Resin composite

Treatment:

Other: Filtek™ Bulk Fill restoration

preheated Bulk-Fill

Experimental group

Description:

20 cavity class II restored with preheated bulk-fill Resin composite

Treatment:

Other: Heated Filtek™ Bulk Fill restoration

Injectable Bulk-Fill

Experimental group

Description:

20 cavity class II restored with injectable bulk-fill Resin composite

Treatment:

Other: G-aenial™ BULK Injectable restoration

Sonic-Fill

Experimental group

Description:

20 cavity class II restored with sonic-fill bulk-fill Resin composite

Treatment:

Other: Sonicfill3 restoration