Calculating of Correlations Between ADR, PDR, MAP

Hospital Frydek-Mistek

Status: Completed

Conditions: Colon Neoplasm

Treatments: Device: Colonoscopy

Study type: Observational

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT03723720

MAP

Details and patient eligibility

About

The aim of our study is to compare MAP (mean adenoma per colonoscopy) with ADR (adenoma detection rate) and PDR (polyp detection rate) of all colonoscopists in our department

Full description

ADR (adenoma detection rate) is generally accepted quality indicator. For possible gaming with ADR other indicators are needed. MAP (mean adenoma per colonoscopy) reflects the quality of examination of entire colon and is considered to be the most objective quality indicator. The aim of our study is to compare MAP with ADR and PDR (polyp detection rate) of all colonoscopists in our department.

We want to retrospectively assess the quality indicators of all colonoscopies from January 2013 to December 2017. We want to calculate ADR, PDR and MAP of all our endoscopists for all colonoscopies in patients over 50 years of age excluding therapeutic, IBD, management of complications and sigmoidoscopies (screening, surveillance, diagnostic) and separately only for screening colonoscopies. Correlations between MAP/ADR and MAP/PDR will be performed using Pearson´s correlation coefficient.

Enrollment: 6,925 patients

Sex: All

Ages: 50+ years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• people over 50 years of age coming for colonoscopic examination (screening, surveillance, diagnostic)

Exclusion criteria

• age under 50 years
• indication for colonoscopy: therapeutic, IBD, management of complications and sigmoidoscopies

Trial design

6,925 participants in 1 patient group

Patients after colonoscopy over 50 years

Description:

All colonoscopies in patients over 50 years of age (screening, surveillance, diagnostic) excluding therapeutic, IBD, management of complications and sigmoidoscopies

Treatment:

Device: Colonoscopy