ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Carbetocin vs. Oxytocin at Elective Cesarean Section

S

Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital

Status

Completed

Conditions

Postpartum Hemorrhage

Treatments

Drug: Carbetocin
Drug: Oxytocin

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

Details and patient eligibility

About

The study investigators are comparing 2 drugs (oxytocin and carbetocin) at 2 different dosages, to help prevent serious bleeding (hemorrhage) after cesarean deliveries. These drugs are used routinely to help contract the uterus and keep it contracted after the delivery of the baby and placenta; this reduces the amount of blood you might lose. At Mount Sinai Hospital, currently oxytocin is used, but its effect on the uterus is much shorter than that of carbetocin. Internationally, there is no consensus as to what the most effective drug to use is and at which dose. The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada has recently revised its guidelines to suggest 100 micrograms (mcg) of carbetocin as the drug of choice at elective cesarean section. Guidelines from the United Kingdom and the United States currently suggest oxytocin at various doses as the drug of choice at elective cesarean sections. Previous studies at Mount Sinai Hospital have shown that lower doses of oxytocin, 0.35 International Units (IU), and carbetocin, 20 mcg, may be as effective as the higher recommended doses. The investigators plan to conduct a large study to confirm these findings so that they can use the most appropriate dose in the future. Furthermore, the investigators hope to demonstrate that side effects are lower with the lower dose regimens.

Full description

Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is a major cause of maternal death worldwide. Oxytocin is the most commonly used uterotonic drug to prevent and treat PPH in the world. However, oxytocin has a very short duration of action, requiring a continuous infusion to achieve sustained uterotonic activity. Moreover, large doses are associated with adverse effects like hypotension, nausea, vomiting, dysrhythmias and ST changes. The Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada (SOGC) has recommended a single dose of 100 mcg of the longer acting carbetocin at elective cesarean section to promote uterine contraction. In multiple studies performed at Mount Sinai Hospital, we have shown that smaller doses of oxytocin (ED 90 0.35 IU) and carbetocin (ED 90 14.8 mcg) are effective in achieving adequate uterine tone at elective cesarean section. No study has directly compared the high dose regimens with the low dose regimens; therefore a large double-blind randomized controlled trial is necessary to show the non-inferiority of the lower doses of both drugs.

There is a lack of consensus as to what the optimal uterotonic regime is globally. Furthermore, variability in the international guidelines regarding the choice of first line uterotonic in prevention of PPH adds to the confusion. With the widespread availability of carbetocin in some of the developed countries, including Canada, the question of which uterotonic to adopt and at which dose becomes even more difficult to ascertain. Studies that have currently been published suggest the ED90 doses of carbetocin and oxytocin provide adequate uterine contraction with possibly fewer side effects associated with the lower dosed regimens. These advantages may provide a better safety profile and patient satisfaction. To the best of our knowledge, no studies have compared the low doses (ED90) of oxytocin vs. carbetocin, or low (ED90) vs high (conventional) doses of the two drugs in the setting of elective cesarean section. The results of this study will provide evidence on the efficacy and safety of the ED90 dosing compared directly to the higher dosing of both drugs.

Our hypothesis is that the ED90 doses of carbetocin and oxytocin will not be inferior to the higher dosing as determined by the intensity of uterine contraction using a VNRS in women undergoing elective cesarean section. We anticipate that the intensity of uterine contraction using the VNRS at 2 minutes post administration of all drugs will fall within the predetermined margin to signify non-inferiority of all regimens.

Enrollment

278 patients

Sex

Female

Ages

18 to 50 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia.
  • Written informed consent to participate in this study.
  • Full-term pregnancy
  • Non labouring patients

Exclusion criteria

  • Refusal to give written informed consent.
  • Allergy or hypersensitivity to carbetocin or oxytocin.
  • Labouring patients
  • Need for general anesthesia
  • Conditions that predispose to uterine atony and postpartum hemorrhage such as placenta previa, multiple gestation, preeclampsia, eclampsia, macrosomia, polyhydramnios, uterine fibroids, previous history of uterine atony and postpartum bleeding, or bleeding diathesis.
  • Hepatic, renal, and cardiovascular disease.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Quadruple Blind

278 participants in 4 patient groups

Carbetocin 20mcg
Active Comparator group
Description:
Carbetocin 20mcg, administered intravenously over 1 minute, immediately upon delivery of the anterior shoulder of the baby.
Treatment:
Drug: Carbetocin
Carbetocin 100mcg
Active Comparator group
Description:
Carbetocin 100mcg, administered intravenously over 1 minute, immediately upon delivery of the anterior shoulder of the baby.
Treatment:
Drug: Carbetocin
Oxytocin 0.5IU
Active Comparator group
Description:
Oxytocin 0.5IU, administered intravenously over 1 minute, immediately upon delivery of the anterior shoulder of the baby.
Treatment:
Drug: Oxytocin
Oxytocin 5IU
Active Comparator group
Description:
Oxytocin 5IU, administered intravenously over 1 minute, immediately upon delivery of the anterior shoulder of the baby.
Treatment:
Drug: Oxytocin

Trial contacts and locations

2

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems